Firs of all i would like to say that this game was fun to play ...
Robert Abbott, Amazon
23 July 2014
Summary: Firs of all i would like to say that this game was fun to play and not that hard to strategize any moves what so ever. That being said i would like to point out that the story of sgt baker interesting an not hard to follow if you have had played the previous ones. Pros: Good gameplay Decent graphics Characters are interesting Physics are goo good Cons: Kinda short Type of game youd only play once Ai kinda weird In all even though the game may be a little short it is...
Summary: The story is awesome, although it's not as good as "Road to Hill 30" where you can choose the fate of your "brothers" (soldiers). And the graphic is great, especially the landscape and when scooping down. The cutscene is better than the game, though. The atmosphere is awesome, this game tells us that war isn't funny, it's a hell.
Summary: Brothers in Arms was just doing its own thing, during the 7th Generation. Rather than take Cues from Call of Duty, it implemented its own ideas. All of them miserably failed. And, the story sucks, and the voice acting made me mute the game IMMEDIATELY. Wasted potential at its finest. Want realism? Try Red Orchestra. Want Fun? I recommend Call of Duty: World at War. Want a good game? Try almost any other mainstream shooter, on the system.
Summary: Can't even be bothered to write a real review. This game is bad for so many reasons. Cover system is horrible, once you take cover the game moves in to 3rd person which completely takes you out of the moment. Voice acting is terrible and character models are unbelievably cheesy. Played this game for 30 minutes before completely giving up. As a HUGE fan of the original Band of Brothers this is the most disappointing game I've ever played. Seriously, it's that bad.