Summary: The story is awesome, although it's not as good as "Road to Hill 30" where you can choose the fate of your "brothers" (soldiers). And the graphic is great, especially the landscape and when scooping down. The cutscene is better than the game, though. The atmosphere is awesome, this game tells us that war isn't funny, it's a hell.
Summary: Brothers in Arms was just doing its own thing, during the 7th Generation. Rather than take Cues from Call of Duty, it implemented its own ideas. All of them miserably failed. And, the story sucks, and the voice acting made me mute the game IMMEDIATELY. Wasted potential at its finest. Want realism? Try Red Orchestra. Want Fun? I recommend Call of Duty: World at War. Want a good game? Try almost any other mainstream shooter, on the system.
Summary: Can't even be bothered to write a real review. This game is bad for so many reasons. Cover system is horrible, once you take cover the game moves in to 3rd person which completely takes you out of the moment. Voice acting is terrible and character models are unbelievably cheesy. Played this game for 30 minutes before completely giving up. As a HUGE fan of the original Band of Brothers this is the most disappointing game I've ever played. Seriously, it's that bad.
Summary: A game worth playing it has interesting shooter mechanics and plays better as a tactical shooter than the early ghost recon offerings on this console. Story is dull but the game itself is very entertaining.
Summary: This title was pretty awful my FPS standards, it should be categorized as a strategy title. Gearbox was attempting to bridge so many concepts from other genres such a covering from third-person shooters, squad commanding, and FPS that the entire package just comes across as a mess. Poor frame rates and visuals that wouldn't have cut it in 2008 It plays and feels like a second tier game from the early 2000's. Avoid.