www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Waterloo: Napoleon's Last Battle
4.9 out of 10

Waterloo: Napoleon's Last Battle

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Waterloo: Napoleon's Last Battle

Showing 1-5 of 5
Overall 6
6.0

They don't make games like these anymore

Lai Chi Wei "Laconic", Amazon
3 August 2009
  • Summary: History first, as this is an eight-year old game. I am a great fan of "Sid Meier's Gettysburg!" from which this game borrows its engine. I also have played Antietam, the second franchise of Gettysburg.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Flexibility is Not an Option

M. James "jilesmeacham", Amazon
22 March 2003
  • Summary: Based upon the successful Gettysburg engine this game shares many of the same faults, but does have a few benefits. The good news is that Cavalry is back in. Gettysburg had miserable cavalry which dismounted to attack and basically fought as infantry.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Your mileage may vary.

Amazon
2 July 2001
  • Summary: By the review title, how much you will enjoy Waterloo: Napoleon's Last Battle (WNLB) depends on what you expect of it. In the tactical scale (the interaction of the combat battalions, or "units"), Breakaway has certainly done a commendable job of evolving the SMG game engine to cover Napoleonic-era...
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Good potential. Try again.

Sam King, Amazon
30 March 2001
  • Summary: I was really excited about this game. Unfortunately it does not live up to expectations. The graphics are not up to standards achieved on some other strategy simulations (the Cossacks preview, for example). Movement, at least on my PC,(which is able to handle B17 2 with no problems)is not smooth.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Three Stars

Martin Marauder, Amazon
28 January 2016