www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

War of the Roses
7.7 out of 10

War of the Roses

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with War of the Roses

Showing 1-10 of 26
Overall 2
2.0

User Review

Chirpe, Metacritic
19 September 2013
  • Summary: The game is massively unbalanced; One large example would be that the first class that is unlocked when you start the game does extremely minimal to no damage to two of the other classes.
  • Read full review

User Review

D04S02B04, Metacritic
14 September 2013
  • Summary: Rated 0 for a game that isn't worth your money and time at all for the following reasons: 1. Pay to win. 2. Horrible balance in weapons & armour, only very few weapons and customisations are viable 3. Poor community (for a multiplayer game), inactive forums, foul mouthed players ingame.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

User Review

Reality_Check, Metacritic
8 October 2012
  • Summary: Ok, there have been some negative reviews surrounding this game. Some of them are legitimate, most are not. Let's sort out the facts on WOTR. First off, let me say I am a veteran Mount & Blade player.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

User Review

CBZ, Metacritic
4 October 2012
  • Summary: Excellent game that takes the essence of the multiplayer Mount and Blade to medieval England, with much better graphics and new weapons. Lots of fun to play although it lacks variety. I hope they come up with new weapons, maps and armors. Its also 29.99$.
  • Read full review
Overall 3
3.0

User Review

Tyrx, Metacritic
3 October 2012
  • Summary: I could see how this game might appeal to any newbies of the genre but the facts stand that FatShark have managed to butcher what could have been an awesome game in an awful attempt to make the game appeal to the masses.
  • Read full review
Overall 5
5.0

User Review

H00b, Metacritic
3 October 2012
  • Summary: Great idea done badly. The melee combat is terrible. Players squad spawn on each other so combat basically amounts to people popping out of thin air until one side has enough to win, then repeat. Strategy zero, skill zero, tactics zero, zerg everything.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

User Review

DroneIV, Metacritic
2 October 2012
  • Summary: I was looking forward to a single player but after launching the game, learned that there wasn't. disappointing... Still, I decided to jump into multiplayer. I played for about 15 minutes, I killed one or two guys. One guy I fought for maybe five minutes.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

User Review

fandango89, Metacritic
2 October 2012
  • Summary: The idea of this game is great but not executed very well. Although they say it takes skill and to some degree it does, most of the time it doesn't. All it boils down to is a bunch of people fighting in a concealed area. That leads to most of the time you die it is because you got gangbanged 3 on 1.
  • Read full review
Overall 5
5.0

User Review

Amorebietal, Metacritic
2 October 2012
  • Summary: I think the idea is great, and the game is kinda fun to play... for 20 minutes. Then it's just the same thing over and over again. In other words, it's a game which you grow tired of really quickly. And the graphics aren't that great. worth 29 euros?
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

User Review

Skaz, Metacritic
2 October 2012
  • Summary: This is an excellent game, with a steep learning curve. If you are more used to slower-paced games, this game will throw you off. If you are used to games that require little in terms of practice and skill, this game will throw you off.
  • Read full review
Next page >>