www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Unreal-tournament-2003-pc.363342
6.5 out of 10

Unreal Tournament 2003

Great Deal: $39.95

Reviews and Problems with Unreal Tournament 2003

Showing 1-10 of 18
Overall 6
6.0

Some more Unreality

existtoin..., Ciao
3 July 2007
  • Excerpt: "Unreal Tournament was one of the most intense, electrifying games in the history, and it was nothing less than a wonder among the First Person Shooters. But the sequel to the game went the other way, as it could offer nothing more than some better graphics. We have the next offerings in Unreal Tournament 2004 and 2007 which is to be released soon, but Unreal Tournament still stands as a void between two outstanding titles. Well, it does look better, ...
  • Pros: graphics, music, other effects, multiplayer
  • Cons: not enough options, some great features of the original are missing, not too realistic
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Very pretty, but uninteresting gameplay

Brendan Walters "brendanwalters", Amazon
11 February 2004
  • Summary: The first thing you'll notice is that this game is gorgeous on an adequate system (even a two-year old midrange desktop). Continuing in the UT tradition, the levels are varied, artistic, detailed, and very open, with plenty of options for getting from point A to point B and possibly changing destinations to point C in a hurry when you see three enemies barring your way. The graphics are truly stunning, and the physics engine is amazingly detailed.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

it's ok

Jeffrey Stephen, Amazon
6 January 2004
  • Summary: i liked it it had everything going for it BUT the size of the game was minute i finished it in 1 hour and with the unreal tornimant the first one it looks like it was slaped together in minits
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Ok, I guess

Alfons Bullwinkle, Amazon
7 December 2003
  • Summary: Whatever, its not great. It is not realistic at all, nor does it try to be. You run at incredibal speeds, take punishment that seems more sutable for a tank, and there are all sorts of powerups around the ring. But it does offer a relief from games like Counter-Strike. Its always fun playing futuristic FPS's, where you wield massive guns, and wear giant power suits, but it gets old fast.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Unreal 2k3's not the best, but it's NOT HORRIBLE!

Arich Havard, Amazon
16 November 2003
  • Summary: Ok, so I can understand most people's complaints about all those features being taken off the game. And I'll admit I was a bit dissapointed too. But in no way is this game horrible! Yes it's got great graphics, and as much as I know graphics don't make a game, it sure helps alot! And the lighting effects? Amazing. I haven't seen a single lighting glitch in the game..so i'm geussing the people with lighting glitch complaints have computers that may be a little bit off..
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Nothing extraordinary

Frédérick Caron, Amazon
28 October 2003
  • Summary: I bought this game, and although I am not big on Unreal and Quake and the sort I thought it would be interesting to give it a try. I just found the concept of blowing up everyone and picking up weapons to be boring. I did try the game...gave it about 2 hours gameplay time, and it just was not enough to keep me entertained. The graphics are great, the gameplay is extrememly fast. But the content, well, if you like to shoot and run, then this is for you.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Good game but wait if your getting it now

"adancingmonkeynamedbobo", Amazon
15 August 2003
  • Summary: The reason i say wait is because they are making a sequal in i think the end of October. I like the overall playing of the game and the graphics. I also like the whole theme that the whole thing is a sport with spectators like wrestling. But i found that a few levels where a little harder than the general uprising of difficulty, The editor i can't figure out. Hopefully they'll make it a little easier like warcraft 3's editor.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

OK Game

Andrew Bloch "Andrew Bloch", Amazon
13 August 2003
  • Summary: This game is pretty fun. The ragdoll physics are neat. But the weapons are horrible. Sniper rifles should kill in one hit, that simple. it should reward you for headshots, but 2 shots to the chest doesn't work. when u r a sniper, 1 shot is often all u get. They really messed it up from the original Unreal Tourney. The original is much beter, and I now have that installed, While 2003 collects dust.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Lacks the atmosphere that it's prequel added to the game

"mnwilson", Amazon
14 July 2003
  • Summary: Unreal Tournament-adding a new defintion of death match in the dictionary. Forget the Quake 3 3-D crap, that's just boring. Unreal Tournament actually feeled and still does feel like a single player experience for a multiplayer game. The original unreal tournament hit the shelves in about november 1999. What did it provide for the gaming community that was good?
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

UT2K3 - trying to be objective

Owen Oyer "q3catscratch", Amazon
21 May 2003
  • Summary: First, my credentials: I'm a semi-professional Quake 3 player, and I've been playing shooters for the last 5 years. No, I'm not the catscratch from QW - I played Lith Q2 with SoH before moving on to OSP Q3. Ok, let's get to the reviewing. When it comes to UT, there's little to no middle ground - people either love it or hate it, but only a few will be objective. I'll try to be one of those. From a technical point of view, the game is superb.
  • Read full review
Next page >>