www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Unreal Tournament 2003
6.0 out of 10

Unreal Tournament 2003

Great Deal: $39.95

Reviews and Problems with Unreal Tournament 2003

Showing 1-10 of 189

User Review

Compman99, Metacritic
12 February 2007
  • Summary: Its Just Like Quake the graphics are too much like a cartoon very unrealistic,The first version is much better as you can see by how many servers are on GOTY 1999 version 600 to the 2003 = 100. Unreal Tournament GOTY Edition is WAY BETTER!
  • Read full review

User Review

CHRISW., Metacritic
1 January 2004
  • Summary: I would agree the weapons really suck most of all the lighting(sniper) weapon.the weapons feel clumsier and less satisfying than the original UT.im not too fond of the 'warhammer 40,000' look of the characters either.as for the game being 'TOO heavy little processors etc etc' as someone sed i...
  • Read full review

User Review

EricC., Metacritic
3 January 2003
  • Summary: Even though there seems to be no strategy whatsoever in this game, that doesn't mean it's bad. With all the strategy I use playing games like Counter-Strike and Battlefield 1942, it's nice to play a game that simply comes down to just kill or be killed.
  • Read full review

User Review

[Anonymous], Metacritic
25 December 2002
  • Summary: I actually think its a 9.9 but 10 is close to it. Why i think that? The weapons are awesome The graphics are cool The maps are great The sounds are okay The gameplay is SUPERCOOL The system requirments are O.K The bots are ok too But the menu is only worth a 8 bye.
  • Read full review

User Review

JC, Metacritic
20 November 2002
  • Summary: Graphs are good, I'd even say great.....but thats about it. The weapons are way too spammy (newbs heaven) and all the cool weapons that existed in UT are now.....dead. Shock Riffle has been demolished, the sniper is now a ''lightning gun'' that has a fire rate of 1 shot per decade and the mini gun...
  • Read full review

User Review

BitBurn, Metacritic
8 October 2002
  • Summary: Not bad, not bad at all. Just the same old redundant story again....mind you I only tried the demo!
  • Read full review

User Review

Abrojo, Metacritic
6 October 2002
  • Summary: The graphics are gorgeous except the characters graphics which i didn't like that much (too thin to say in a way). Maybe its just me but the balance in weapons isn't just as right as before, it needs tweaking there. The rest is superb.
  • Read full review

User Review

Metacritic
1 October 2002
  • Summary: What are you waiting for? GO BUY THIS GAME! This is the only shooter you'll ever need, single player fun, multiplayer fun, GREAT graphics and superb gameplay all the way! Simply awesome!
  • Read full review

User Review

IB, Metacritic
1 October 2002
  • Summary: Gorgeous, sexy and vapid. More new tech than you can shake a stick at, and so few interesting design elements that it'll start turning up on used software shelves in a few weeks. Can't fault Epic for stunning execution; they set out to make the hottest FPS available, and they did just that. Just.
  • Read full review

User Review

SilentA., Metacritic
30 September 2002
  • Summary: This is the most fun I've ever had playing a FPS! But damn do you ever need a good system to run it at full details, good thing i have one because this game is too gorgeous to play at low details!!!
  • Read full review
Next page >>