www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Universal-combat.3370509
4.8 out of 10

Universal Combat

In September 2003, Battlecruiser Generations, the fifth title in Read more

Great Deal: $14.99

Reviews and Problems with Universal Combat

Showing 1-10 of 14

User Review

DrFriend, Metacritic
16 June 2013
  • Summary: This game is amazing! It is free and the graphics aren't that bad. It isn't something that you will play forever, but playing with friends is awesome!
  • Read full review

User Review

kanefriessner, Metacritic
9 February 2013
  • Summary: A multiplayer Call of Duty 4 (and so on...) clone, nothing more. Also, it's lagging soo hard sometimes and you have to shoot soo many bullets to the enemy to kill him/her. Anyway, the graphics are good, but it's not enough to call it a good game.
  • Read full review

User Review

DCkaya, Metacritic
9 February 2013
  • Summary: Not a good game at all. Poor graphics(not good enough to compete with other f2p's), poor character and weapon customization, bad maps( maps allow you to camp), poor gameplay, a lot of children players. The worst side about the game was unrealistic weapons, having lag always even with lowest options and the truth that if you want to get some kill streaks you must be a camper. The only good Not a good game at all.
  • Read full review

User Review

gamer27997, Metacritic
31 December 2012
  • Summary: nice graphics, modes are good.I was in the closed beta and i ensure you that the game have change a lot of things(weapons and maps,upgrade). But sometimes remembers me the well-known game Call of Duty, but it still like me.
  • Read full review

User Review

echoback, Metacritic
27 December 2012
  • Summary: If you want Call of Duty, buy Call of Duty. Even if all you want is a simple FPS, don't bother with this. Arctic Combat is a just-different-enough-not-to-get-sued ripoff of the COD series with terrible translation, abhorrent voice acting, and lag bad enough to ruin any fun you might accidentally stumble across. The first grenade I tossed was greeted with a guttural "Grenade throw!" If you want Call of Duty, buy Call of Duty.
  • Read full review

User Review

hande, Metacritic
16 December 2012
  • Summary: Is not that bad for a F2P game, still need to play more hours to test it properly, but i can tell you that; * it's like some kind of mix between COD and CS, maybe with more close quarters maps, short range and fast action. * graphics are quite good IMHO, i think it looks better than COD on my PC, but maps are smaller instead.
  • Read full review

User Review

liamrdutton, Metacritic
14 December 2012
  • Summary: Been playing this game for about a week now and i'am starting to become addicted to it. This game is similar to most fps military games out there like ( Combat Arms, A.V.A, Crossfire etc ) . The graphics are average but still good, the guns are little overpowered , sweet selection of small and big maps and ranking up doesn't take along.
  • Read full review

User Review

onRAWR, Metacritic
10 December 2012
  • Summary: Awesome game! The incredible Lag it had once the game had shifted to Steam, was addressed and fixed ASAP it seems! Just to inform those who are holding back because of that. Which is silly either way as the game is free... and well it feels alot, let me repeat that in caps - ALOT, like the CoD (Call fo Duty) Series, which is a freaking brilliant thing imo! It's just pure and plain fun Awesome game!
  • Read full review

User Review

John95, Metacritic
10 December 2012
  • Summary: This game is very bad. Pros: Good graphics from unreal engine, Good weapon sounds, Good Animations, Online bot match Cons: Takes way to many shots to kill someone, Extreme lag even on lowest settings, Weapons and animations replicate Cod4, Killstreaks promote camping, Game mechanic where you get many kills you become weak, Lots of children gamers (cod players) camp, base rape, text This game is very bad.
  • Read full review

User Review

Ordish, Metacritic
9 December 2012
  • Summary: Arctic Combat is a mixed bag. On one hand, the game is not horrible but there is a significant problem. One of the most fundamental aspects of a first person shooter is, well, the shooting. In Arctic Combat the lag from shooting will literally force you to lead your target by a significant amount, ie aiming completely ahead of the target at less than 20 yards to even hit them. I don't know Arctic Combat is a mixed bag.
  • Read full review
Next page >>