Summary: This game was a great disappointment. The play is very old like donkey kong or of that type. Not much in the way of instructions or help. I got stuck often and never finished it. I regularly play adventure games so I'm not new to video games but I guess i should have tried a demo.
Summary: Misleading - the graphics on this are cheap, cheap, cheap. Cheaper than cheap...it's a flat world reminiscent of a bad phone app or a game from 20 years ago. I am a big gamer and loved Sunshine of a Spotless mind (see another review) and thought, what the heck, even if it isn't really a game, I'll...
Why you should get the demo before buying this game
18 May 2012
Summary: The graphics in this game are not just worse than most games produced by amateurs working alone, but they are about the same as Kings Quest I, produced in the early 1980s. That doesn't make it a bad game.
Summary: Who on earth accepted this "game" for publication? The graphics on the box look like 2012. The "graphics" in the game look like 1982. I saw better on a ZX Spectrum. If I want to do origami, I can buy a book and paper cheaper than the cost of this "game".
Only given it a star because Amazon won't accept 'nil points'.
18 May 2012
Summary: Bought this based on customer reviews, looked forward to a good storyline. Haven't seen graphics as primitive as this for 20 or more years. Was it made by a first year student? Two supposed scientists seem to be invading some old guy's mind and manipulating his memories.
Summary: Das Titelbild täuscht! Es ist ein total pixeliges, langweiliges Spiel mit lauter "eckigen Figuren und eckigen Bewegungen". Das Bild ist eine Lüge. Und irgendwo macht das Spiel überhaupt keinen Sinn. Langweilig.