www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Sudden Strike 3: Arms for Victory
6.1 out of 10

Sudden Strike 3: Arms for Victory

The third in the RTS series Sudden Strike, featuring a new Sudde Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Sudden Strike 3: Arms for Victory

Showing 1-10 of 17
Overall 8
8.0

a good game worth the money

conzer, Play.com
9 January 2009
  • Conclusion: i cant believe these other ratings people have given, this game may not have the graphics of call of duty 4, but this game is all about war and massive battles not first person shooter.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

no structure at all for explosions specialy those from arty

Feldschutse, Play.com
9 January 2009
  • Conclusion: I played second DEMO of SS 3and I used to play with huge pleasure the old ones SS1 and 2 but in this one SS3 after very long wait the realism is a bit down. A sherman needs to shoot 5 ap shells to get a tank similar with pz1 i mean common 75cal shel shoot by a sherman is not so deadly BUT for a weak...
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Such a Let Down

DarkSpark, Play.com
9 January 2009
  • Conclusion: I used to play SS forever but I must say this game is a BIG let down.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

DO NOT BUY THIS GAME!!!

namtab99, Play.com
9 January 2009
  • Conclusion: I loved ss1 and thought ss2 was ok but this game is terrible. From the moment I started playing I noticed very little difference in graphics quality, but I shrugged that off because graphics aren't that important to me. It was the gameplay however that killed it.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Not a Good Game at all

Morgoth22, Play.com
9 January 2009
  • Conclusion: Firstly this game as the title suggests is way behind the times,its controls are a little dodgy to,but that is the least of your worries,they have changed so many of the good things that made the first Sudden Strike games good,while keeping the things that needed changing,they also have based all...
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Far behind it's time.

Monty555, Play.com
9 January 2009
  • Conclusion: Fireglow has had this game finished for several years now. But their insistence that this game was to be the best RTS ever was their downfall. Unwilling to sign a deal with a publisher below their high terms, they had to delay the game again and again.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

poor in comparison to other sudden strikes

tonybaroney, Play.com
9 January 2009
  • Conclusion: i have waited for the next addition to the family of sudden strikes, what a disappointment! they have set this game back years, CDV were the masters of this genre, what has happened?
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Realistic and enjoyable

Danno75, Play.com
9 January 2009
  • Conclusion: First of all, I haven't played Company of Heroes, so can't compare. But I have played Sudden Strike 1 & 2 for years.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

just great.

gameman1, Play.com
9 January 2009
  • Conclusion: I have played all the ss games and add ons this one as far as i'm, concerned is great the gafix are good no probs with that yes there are one or two bugs but the patches that ive down loaded have sorted it out ok. I hope there is going to be some follow ups to ss3afv. I just love it.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

what a shame

Croydon123, Play.com
9 January 2009
  • Conclusion: I played ssf for almost 10 years, and i still think its great. But what a BIG let down ss3 has been, I was looking forward to it coming out, but its just a load of rubbish. U would have more fun with pac man.................!!!!!
  • Read full review
Next page >>