Reviews and Problems with Sudden Strike 3: Arms for Victory
Showing 1-10 of 23
5 June 2014
Summary: This is one of those games that you have to spend hours to play in order to get places, but still is one of my favorite games for PC, you have thousands of people under your command, attacking places and taking them are very fun, and can be some of the best battles I have had in games, if you are...
Summary: This game had a big potential but the publishers didn't do a good job, and the developers could have done a little better on the graphics. Nevertheless, the game is still great, and you can download the free Add-on (a must!
Summary: Unit selection and control is a nightmare. IN the heat of battle it's next to impossible to control what really needs to be controlled. Units mix and merge, one arong turn and entire squads are wiped in nano-seconds.
Summary: A great disappointment. Sudden Strike 2 was so good, this is just too big. I let it run for an hour whilst I read the newspaper, as my intervention didn't seem to make much difference, just waves of my troops landing and being wiped out. Who cares who wins?
no structure at all for explosions specialy those from arty
9 January 2009
Conclusion: I played second DEMO of SS 3and I used to play with huge pleasure the old ones SS1 and 2 but in this one SS3 after very long wait the realism is a bit down. A sherman needs to shoot 5 ap shells to get a tank similar with pz1 i mean common 75cal shel shoot by a sherman is not so deadly BUT for a weak...
Conclusion: I loved ss1 and thought ss2 was ok but this game is terrible. From the moment I started playing I noticed very little difference in graphics quality, but I shrugged that off because graphics aren't that important to me. It was the gameplay however that killed it.