www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

of Spades
6.5 out of 10

of Spades

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with of Spades

Showing 1-10 of 10

User Review

Boris, Metacritic
9 January 2013
  • Summary: Nice game. Fast paced, a good idea, lots of fun, amusing game modes, and would deserve more (especially more than its current average of 4.5 or 51). So what are the cons? Well, lack of self-hosting feature (so you cannot have your own private hosted game); and the most annoying one: lack of...
  • Read full review

User Review

Steinway, Metacritic
26 December 2012
  • Summary: Once again, Jagex manages to **** things up. This time, it's a rip-off of another great game! Jagex CLAIMS to have been working on the game with the original creators for a year. NO, they jumped in on the project in November 2012 so that they would try healing the harmed souls from The Evolution of...
  • Read full review

User Review

PotentPlacebo, Metacritic
24 December 2012
  • Summary: I saw this game advertised on Steam and through it'd be a great digital stocking stuffer for myself and my younger brother. It's a fun game to play but it has a fatal flaw; YOU CANNOT HOST YOUR OWN GAME! The developers instead have opted to host every server themselves.
  • Read full review

User Review

Sebbo1298, Metacritic
23 December 2012
  • Summary: This is a good game... the only problem is that it isn't "Ace of Spades". I, too, snapped this game up way too hastily, thinking I was buying the same copy of the game that I so lovingly played not a few months ago.
  • Read full review

User Review

Netchy, Metacritic
15 December 2012
  • Summary: Now, when I buy a game I expect it to live up to its monies worth. For $10, this game did not even live up to that. There are no Australian servers. For three days now I have been browsing the servers just waiting for a server that has under 100 ping to no avail.
  • Read full review

User Review

sollecks, Metacritic
15 December 2012
  • Summary: Wow, to break a game this bad takes some amount of talent. I hadn't even played the beta version before this one, so I wasn't coming into this biased. I bought this on impulse on release and was immediately disappointed. Buggy, laggy, unbalanced, and just not fun.
  • Read full review

User Review

J--J, Metacritic
15 December 2012
  • Summary: This game is awful. It promises "Construction. Combat. Creativity." but delivers only combat, and does so very poorly. It's been three days since release and their servers still can't handle the game, making it essentially unplayable on full servers, but even if it was working the gameplay mechanics...
  • Read full review

User Review

Fleischgewehr, Metacritic
14 December 2012
  • Summary: I bought the game immediately, since it looked so fun and intriguing and i loved the concept. Well, what can i say: I am a bit disappointed there. I thought i get to design whole maps to tear them down. I thought i could host my own game. But NO, said STEAM (or JagEx, the company behind the game).
  • Read full review

User Review

SlamDrag, Metacritic
14 December 2012
  • Summary: The beta of the game was very fun. I played it for nearly a year. But the current version.... it loses most of its charm. It used to be a slower paced tactical shooter, which required strategy and team work to win.
  • Read full review

User Review

Un0va, Metacritic
13 December 2012
  • Summary: Even if you ignore the fact that Ace of Spades is no longer free, it's still vastly inferior now than it was before. Before, the worst thing you had to deal with was a shotgun and everyone would build massive tunnels and bases, and it was awesome. Now, what's the point?
  • Read full review