www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Dummy.190587
7.0 out of 10

of Spades

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with of Spades

Showing 1-10 of 10

User Review

MonaCraft, Metacritic
1 March 2013
  • Summary: I am shocked at how many negative reviews there are. You should be looking at the game as it is alone, not comparing it to the old game and giving it a 0 because you like the old game better this game is still passing through some updating also Jagex is trying to incorporate the old game wit modes like classic ctf I think before blurting out anything you need to look at how far this game can go and how far this game is going to go Lastly I think all of this users should...
  • Read full review

User Review

Grittle, Metacritic
9 February 2013
  • Summary: For most of these people who gave this game low scores, you should try waiting for the updates. as they came out with the classic mode, which in my opinion, is 80% similar to the original.
  • Read full review

User Review

Boris, Metacritic
9 January 2013
  • Summary: Nice game. Fast paced, a good idea, lots of fun, amusing game modes, and would deserve more (especially more than its current average of 4.5 or 51). So what are the cons? Well, lack of self-hosting feature (so you cannot have your own private hosted game); and the most annoying one: lack of precision and/or buggy crosshair: when you aim exactly at the head of a non-moving enemy with a precision rifle from too far away, you cannot even hit him.
  • Read full review

User Review

PotentPlacebo, Metacritic
24 December 2012
  • Summary: I saw this game advertised on Steam and through it'd be a great digital stocking stuffer for myself and my younger brother. It's a fun game to play but it has a fatal flaw; YOU CANNOT HOST YOUR OWN GAME! The developers instead have opted to host every server themselves. For a game like this where there could be hours of fun on private servers; building elaborate bases before annihilating each other, the absence of this feature leaves this game feeling extremely lacking.
  • Read full review

User Review

Netchy, Metacritic
15 December 2012
  • Summary: Now, when I buy a game I expect it to live up to its monies worth. For $10, this game did not even live up to that. There are no Australian servers. For three days now I have been browsing the servers just waiting for a server that has under 100 ping to no avail. It is literally impossible to shoot anybody because of the ping and lag issues. Where are the different game modes?
  • Read full review

User Review

sollecks, Metacritic
15 December 2012
  • Summary: Wow, to break a game this bad takes some amount of talent. I hadn't even played the beta version before this one, so I wasn't coming into this biased. I bought this on impulse on release and was immediately disappointed. Buggy, laggy, unbalanced, and just not fun. I couldn't understand why people were raving about this.. then I checked out the beta. It needed some polish, but there is an addictive quality to it. I can understand why people got hooked.
  • Read full review

User Review

J--J, Metacritic
15 December 2012
  • Summary: This game is awful. It promises "Construction. Combat. Creativity." but delivers only combat, and does so very poorly. It's been three days since release and their servers still can't handle the game, making it essentially unplayable on full servers, but even if it was working the gameplay mechanics discourage building in every way possible: People can jetpack over huge patches of the map quickly and weapons do little damage per shot, meaning people will never feel the...
  • Read full review

User Review

csabi, Metacritic
14 December 2012
  • Summary: This game is nothing compare to "original" version. Smaller, tighter maps, faster gameplay, No CTF mode, no Rifle, crap optimization, crap server browser. This game is a huge disappointment.
  • Read full review

User Review

SlamDrag, Metacritic
14 December 2012
  • Summary: The beta of the game was very fun. I played it for nearly a year. But the current version.... it loses most of its charm. It used to be a slower paced tactical shooter, which required strategy and team work to win. Now it focuses on the individual instead of the team, discourages building/destruction and overall makes it just your average run and gun shooter. Now don't get me wrong, I like a lot of games like that. But it doesn't really fit in with the blocky theme.
  • Read full review

User Review

Un0va, Metacritic
13 December 2012
  • Summary: Even if you ignore the fact that Ace of Spades is no longer free, it's still vastly inferior now than it was before. Before, the worst thing you had to deal with was a shotgun and everyone would build massive tunnels and bases, and it was awesome. Now, what's the point? Someone will just come in with a jetpack and blow you up, or someone will just blow you up anyway, because every **** class has enormous explosives, which basically ruins the point of even building...
  • Read full review