Reviews and Problems with Medal of Honor: Warfighter
Showing 1-10 of 20
4 April 2013
Summary: it really is a Pro...but if you've no "fireteam buddy", especially if on an odd-numbered team or your 'buddy' simply fails with sportsmanship, strategy and teamwork then you'll hate this game for the duration of the map!
Pros: Very little for the high price.But if you like to kill this is a fun game.Huge M H fan.
Cons: You need a high end P.C. my I7 at 3.8 with 2 460's had to be cut down to 1600 res...1900 was to much the graphics look great but hang up here and there.This game and alot of the newer games aren't doing XP any more because of higher ram and D11.new Far Cry 3 wants 6 G ram.
Summary: The VoIP can also sometimes be a bit buggy, and matchmaking can sometimes be a pain (but that's a general Origin problem). However I've never joined a match with a friend and gotten separated from them a la BF3.
Pros: Like has been already said, do not expect BF3 or CoD action in MoH. Because that's not the type of game it is, nor is it the type of game that it tries to be (which also is a con, see Cons). Multiplayer is very tight and team oriented. If you play as a lone wolf, you will not be successful. It hinges on working as a fireteam and as a squad overall.
Cons: The only real cons about this game are that it appeals to only a very select type of gamer. Most modern FPS players seem to have been spoiled by the instant satisfaction of CoD style shooters. Being able to run around by yourself and carry a team. Which just doesn't cut it in Warfigher. As a result, people are giving it negative reviews. "Oh no, I have to actually play as a team player? Screw this." Basically what I'm saying is, give the game a chance. You might actua...
Pros: Awesome game. Hybrid if you will. This is NOT BF3 or CoD it is it's own entity. You have to play as a team with none of that, "let's see who can bunny hop around a corner firing first.", crud. You need solid tactical teamwork to play this game. My friends and I, from BF3 to CoD, are all enjoying this game, seems to grow on you more and more as you play it.
Cons: This game is getting negative hype from a lot of people in the forums for being too buggy. This game is no where near as buggy as BF3 or Black Ops were at launch. A lot of the hate is also coming from those people who expected 'BF3 2.0'. This game is a close quarters tactical shooter, it's not a game for the 'lonewolf' player. A few of us also dug through the forum checking stats of these guys who say the game is trash. Turns out 80% of them haven't even played the ga...
Pros: Good Team based game, no dumb 2.0 destruction like BF3, nice clean and crisp grahpics , My PC runs it perfectly fine. I'm personally like both the MoH and CoD, but I'm liking medal of honor, because you can spawn on your buddy and continue and the battle faster and it's more slower pace which I like a lot.
Cons: Reaction time is not that great sometimes and you see and shoot the enemy first buy you end up dying first. something I'm sure they'll fix
Summary: this game is decent it could of been alot better. i've died from more anti personal mines than actual gun fire. i dont understand when u fire your weapon you glow red even when your behind walls. it looks like to me that the battlefield clan is trying to steal CoD fans. This game is like a polished CoD although it's alot better than CoD it has nothing on Battlefield. game still has alot of glithes but game is still new. i havent even touched the single player mode.
Summary: I am not a huge fan of online play, so short single player campains are a continual complaint of mine. Plus, I am not a huge fan of "games" based on real world events. That aside, it is a decent platform. I wish there had been some more game play to it.