Reviews and Problems with Medal of Honor: Pacific Assault
Showing 1-10 of 38
VERY short game DONT WASTE YOUR MONEY even at 5 bucks
robert johnson, Amazon
28 December 2012
Summary: 4 hours at the most and the online will NOT support the 360 controller even thow the controller works for the one player part of the game......EA SCREWS THE POOCH AGINE....im going to stop buying there games and ileagly download them....
Summary: Medal of Honor is Medal of Honor. It did not need to try and clone Call of Duty. And if it did, they could have expanded in better gameplay, and a story that engages you. Or at least one of the two... Alas, it was not meant to be. And I hear the Sequel, MoH: Warfighter is even worse!
Summary: The game starts out sort of lame as there is no way to keep from getting killed right at the start. Do not worry as you are supposed to. There will be a cut away video when this happens and the next thing you are in " trainng ". Then you start the first missions.
Game has so much potential but not worth the purchase
8 November 2010
Summary: This game has so much potential in the single player campaign. The only problem with single player is how short it is. On the very first play through on the hardest difficulty the game takes maybe four hours. I have gone back and played the missions again and it only gets shorter and shorter.
Summary: I was very excited and could not wait for the game to arrive, finally a new installment from a game I used to enjoy many years ago, specially at lanparty's Within 30 minutes i was terribly dissapointed Single player: absolutely no freedom in movement and play style : follow the leader and shut up ,...
Summary: DICE has been putting out some quality material lately. Mirror's Edge was my game of the year in 2008 because it dared to try something new in a flood of first-person sludge. And since I've been playing Battlefield: Bad Company 2 on and off for months now, Medal of Honor became the first game I...
Summary: They did a VERY good job hyping this game. The game play online looked really good for PC. I mainly play multiplayer. I would say I'm an above average player on COD multiplayer, so I was very excited to play this game. It was INTENSELY frustrating!
This would be a good game.. if it was released in 2004.
C. Boeshaar, Amazon
25 October 2010
Summary: If this was released 5-6 years ago, it would've been one of the better shooters out there, but in 2010 it fails. - Singleplayer is yet again a ridiculously short and quick experience, which seems to be the trend these days with FPS games (put as little effort into singleplayer as possible because...
Summary: Compared to Bad Company this looks like it came out ten years ago. I appreciate the theme, which is the reason I purchased it, but the game comes off totally "cheap.". Restrictive gameplay feels like you may as well be on a kid's ride at Disney world where the steering wheel turns, but you really...
Summary: i have to say that normally i'm more than saticfied with all the medal of honor games,but this one i'm very dissapointed in,it's diffaculty level when played on hard is still too easy the game itself was way too short,i couldn't believe i was at the end already.when the last door was kicked in it...