Summary: Game is full of bugs and it doesn't seem to keep up with the great previous chapters of the famed Medal of Honor of WWII. It seems rushed to market and not very well thought out. Save your money or go elsewhere for your FPS fun.
Summary: I wouldn't recommend this game because for several reasons 1. In order to play multiplayer you'll have to download punkbuster which will slow your pc. 2. The game is lagging and my spec are good. 3. Not feeling the game it don't get me into the Afghanistan fighting ground.
Summary: I have never in my life purchased a game when it first came out (first thirty days that is) but I wanted to play Medal of Honor. I have all the others and never was disappointed. Well this is the first and I hope the LAST to disappoint. What were the creators thinking? MOH Airborne gave you free movement and awards in several different aspect and this game? You have to follow follow and follow. No free strategy whatsoever. And the script itself?
Summary: Normally he's off to his "office" with beer and whatever else he does in there and I don't see him for a week after he wastes whatever on a new game. This one- he picks up a six pack on Friday night and he's back in the bedroom two hours later-bored and ready to play. He's never played it again. I've never had such a great weekend - he listened to me for a whole ten minutes and even picked up his laundry he's so bored.
Summary: Dont believe the hype, severely over rated game play. Ever play a very cheap arcade game? You know, the type that you have limited options on what you can do. This game is a prime example of that. No help for your team members (except morale support), no need to aim, just general vacinity is good enough. Very sub standard game play (Everyone just runs around like caos, constantly.
Summary: I was looking for a new game and thought I would give Medal of Honor a try. Me and 3 of my friends picked it up. After 2 weeks of just playing this game and hating it the entire time we switched back to play mostly Bad Company and every once in awhile MW2. There is zero depth to this game. The environment doesn't interact, the tanks are a joke, the guns aren't balanced and it just doesn't look or feel finished. Total waste of 60 dollars.
Summary: I play battlefield bad company 2 and thought that since this game is made by EA and Dice it would rock. Boy was I wrong! If you like getting spawn killed in super small unimaginative maps then buy this game. I bought this game on the day it was released and after about 30 minutes of multi-player I wished I wouldn't have wasted the $60. Do yourself a favor if you want a good FPS and get BFBC2 you won't be disappointed.
Summary: Why is EA's Medal of Honor always playing second fiddle to Call of Duty? In my opinion it is mainly the length of the single player campaign. The fact is, there are still lots of gamers out there that don't have the time or inclination to get good enough to hang with on-line multi-players. We don't want to simply spawn and die, spawn and die, spawn and die. For that reason we want, no we crave, a consuming, lengthy single player campaign.
Summary: Simple game dynamics, point and click. If whatever your pointing at you hit, sounds good? It's not, when your using a sniper, shooting at someone all the way across the map, hit them. And they see you and kill you first with an SMG? WTF. POS game. No dynamics, no spay with SMG, no bullet drop, nothing. So sniper, MG, SMG no difference at all in the weapons except damage. In short, this is a 1980's game with a 2010 price.