www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Master-of-orion-3.362929
4.1 out of 10

Master of Orion 3

In Master of Orion 3 , the sequel to one of the best-loved strat Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Master of Orion 3

Showing 1-10 of 17
Overall 4
4.0

A Wonderful Legacy of a Title That Fell Short

C. R. Nelson, Amazon
27 April 2006
  • Summary: An excellent game idea. I played the first and fell in love with it way back when. This newest version though is a big disappointment. It doesn't have hardly any of the original style that made the first so fun and the interface on this one is *HORRIBLE*. There is no real hand-held manual for such a complicated game, only in-game and that is vague at best.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Master of Orion 3

Nightstorm, Amazon
15 April 2006
  • Summary: I bought this game based on a review I read on Amazon. After buying it and playing, I was somewhat disappointed. The layout of the panels for giving various orders are well designed. The detail of this is very good. What I felt was lacking was that it didn't make me feel as if I was "IN" the game. Not much in terms of visual stimulation. A bunch of menus, clicking to build ships, troops and technology research.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Frustration to the max

Rusty Roberts, Amazon
16 March 2006
  • Summary: Yeah, I'm a little late in writting a review for this game (about three years). I decided to write one now, because i bought this game the day it came out, and just within these past few months (of 2006) i actually figured out how the game actually works. It definitely has a high learning curve, i must of had 300 or so hours in playing this game before i was even a novice at it. To say it's complicated is a serious understatement.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Master of Obstacles...

M. DiSpirito "mentored1", Amazon
2 March 2006
  • Summary: If you've played the original or part 2 of Master of Orion (MOO) then you have an appreciation for all that this game could have been. MOO 3 is not the same game as found in its ancestors. Too much has been layered over and too much has been relegated to the closet. The basic premise of guiding your civilization through various science fiction phases of development is still here - but in a much more complex, confusing, and over-bearing manner.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Overwhelming yet disappointing and dated

Craig Clotfelter, Amazon
8 July 2004
  • Summary: The main problem with this game is that despite the graphical updates and some gameplay tweaks it just feels over 5 years out of date. The amount of micromanagement you can do is astounding. If you are a control freak and like to count grains of sand on a beach, then this is the game for you. For the rest of us mere mortals, the management detail required to really get the most out of this game is just WAY TOO MUCH.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

I wanted to like this game, I really did.

Amazon Customer, Amazon
17 March 2004
  • Summary: Like a number of other reviewers on here, I seem to have been there from the beginning. Played MOO when it came out, still play MOO2 all the time (it even runs beautifully on my new XP machine, of all things, and takes up about 78 mb. I have newer games with savefiles bigger than that). Those games were/are great.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

I'm still waiting for this to be fun.

L. Lamoreau, Amazon
30 June 2003
  • Summary: First off, when I heard MOO3 was coming out, I was excited. More excited because the rumor was that if MOO3 was successful a Master of Magic 2 might be developed. I read all the horrible reviews that everyone wrote, and thought to myself, "Hey, I loved MOO, MOO2, MOM, Civ2" and just about every other turn based strategy game out there. I'll have to like this. I figured all the negative reviews were just by people who get frustrated by complexity. The game is complex.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

So disappointed

Jared Schmitthenner, Amazon
11 July 2004
  • Summary: I was really looking forward to this when it came out - I'm still a huge fan of MoO2. The third MoO game, however, was a huge letdown. In trying to save the player from having to micromanage, the developers created a horrible AI that never doew what you want. Very frustrating, not worth buying or playing.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Overwhelming yet disappointing and dated

Craig Clotfelter, Amazon
8 July 2004
  • Summary: The main problem with this game is that despite the graphical updates and some gameplay tweaks it just feels over 5 years out of date. The amount of micromanagement you can do is astounding. If you are a control freak and like to count grains of sand on a beach, then this is the game for you. For the rest of us mere mortals, the management detail required to really get the most out of this game is just WAY TOO MUCH.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

I wanted to like this game, I really did.

I M Laust, Amazon
17 March 2004
  • Summary: Like a number of other reviewers on here, I seem to have been there from the beginning. Played MOO when it came out, still play MOO2 all the time (it even runs beautifully on my new XP machine, of all things, and takes up about 78 mb. I have newer games with savefiles bigger than that). Those games were/are great.
  • Read full review
Next page >>