No manufacturer description available.

Specifications

Release Date

• First seen
  11 December 2003

See more

1. Lords of Everquest

   Reviewer: Deaf Gamers
   7 December 2005

   Overall 7

   

    

   As a multiplayer game it's easy to learn and quick to get into. The single player campaigns are a little flat though and if you don't play online you may not get the full enjoyment out of the game. It might also appeal if you're a fan of the Everquest games. Read more

2. Lords Of Everquest

   Reviewer: Gameworld Network
   3 December 2003

   Overall 7

   

    

   Lords goes a long way in making EverQuest accessible to casual RTS fans. Hardcore fans on the other hand could find the game to be too simple. Read more

3. Reviewer: teamps2.com
   23 May 2008

   Graphics & Sound: Lords of Everquest takes the Everquest franchise into a new direction, but this new path might not be the best. Overall, Lords of Everquest looks and sounds like a cheap knock-off of Warcraft III . Characters look okay, but really don't go the extra step. Details are sparse, and don't really show off much of what higher end graphic cards have to offer. Character models are blocky, poorly animated and show little in terms of detail. This isn't as... Read more

4. Lords of Everquest

   Reviewer: ActionTrip
   11 December 2003

   Overall 7

   

    

   Since the game carries such an uncommonly popular label, it's a fair assumption that a majority of gamers will expect a top-notch PC game. The truth is that Lords of EverQuest is not a breakthrough in any way, nor does it bring any innovations to the RTS genre. However, while it may not hold the attention of Warcraft III vets, it still offers a fair slice of enjoyable classic RTS gaming. Its simple approach and fluent gameplay will keep you going through all the... Read more

5. Lords of EverQuest

   Reviewer: GameSpy.com
   6 December 2003

   Overall 4

   

    

   Sony's first entry into the RTS category looks and plays like an RTS from three years ago -- except it wouldn't have been good then, either. Read more

1. "Excellant"

   Reviewer: PC Personal Computer Game Reviews
   26 January 2004

   Overall 10

   

    

   Cant fault this one. Graphics rock. Gameplay rocks. If you are familier with everquest then this feels like re-visiting an old friend in a different guise. You command a lord, who creates an army and builds structures to maintain and support that army; your lord and the army he commands can gain experience and therefore rise in levels. At the end of a mission, you get the option to transfer over any successful army members - survival of the fittest if you like, Darwin... Read more

2. It sucked

   Reviewer: Aaron "Boron" Simpson from In a cave, Game Seek
   4 November 2009

   Overall 2

   

    

   It was to complicated and my club kept getting in the way and I hate Josh Keating and love Cpt. Nemoid and Star Trek!!!!!!!!!!! Read more

3. Okay

   Reviewer: Amazon
   29 July 2005

   Overall 2

   

    

   tHIS GAME IS OKAY TO START WITH BUT BECOMES REPETITIVE AND UNCLEAR. aFTER A WHILE IT BEGINS TO BORE THE GAMER AND THEY WILL REALISE THE LACK OF POTENTIAL GRASPED. Pros: +Nobody will steal it Cons: -Poor graphics -expensive in relation to the 10 minutes you'll play it for -Dodgy storyline -Lack of AI -Stupid enemies -Utter rubbish without multiplayer, then irs okayish All in all it is terrible, buy something else worth your money DO NOT BUY. Read more