Reviews and Problems with Gettysburg: Armored Warfare
Showing 1-6 of 6
10 April 2012
Summary: I have made a metacritic account, and asked Steam for a refund upon playing Gettysburg: Armored Warfare. I am a huge fan of indie devs, and I uphold gameplay above all else. It is very rare that I would rate a game so poorly.
Summary: This is quite possibly the worst game I have ever played. The developer even said "you get what you pay for", well, I beg to differ. I didn't pay for a pre-alpha game (as this one appears to be).
Summary: Buyer Beware!! Buggy, unfinished, crashes all the time, poor graphics, no tutorial. This really is one of th epoorest games i have been suckered into playing, it really is THAT bad. Yes its made by a one man team, yes its only Â£8.99 but its not worth it.
Summary: This game is rubbish. I consider myself a long time gamer. I have been around since the Commodor 64. Though it is rare that I see a game this bad. The game play is terrible, there is an abundance of glitches and quite frankly, the game is just plain boring.
Summary: Nothing could prepare me for how poor this game is in all aspects. I realise it was 9.99 on release and had 1 developer, but that to me is no excuse for a game so diabolically bad in aiming, movement, AI intelligence (most dont even fire at you, just run passed you under fire) and the RTS element...
Summary: Good intentions... Bad Glitches. No spawn menu I found that clicking on units in my teams spawn was the only way to spawn. I really hope there are updates for this game i think it could be awesome even the 3rd person.. for those of you who hate third person stop playing gears of war...