www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Gettysburg: Armored Warfare
5.3* out of 10

Gettysburg: Armored Warfare

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Gettysburg: Armored Warfare

Showing 1-10 of 10

User Review

Etocholes, Metacritic
30 May 2012
  • Summary: I used to believe no game deserved a 0...then i played Gettysburg. To Wood431, who gave this game an 8, and to the other person who gave this game a 7, hell to anyone who gave above a 0, SHAME. ON. YOU!
  • Read full review

User Review

Discord, Metacritic
19 May 2012
  • Summary: It has some interesting concepts, but unfortunately seems to have been pushed into release too early. The developer/player interaction in the Steam forums for the game is great, however. Had the developer been given more time he probably could have released a solid game.
  • Read full review

User Review

ScreamingWargod, Metacritic
15 May 2012
  • Summary: This is by far the worst garbage that I've seen that has ever been sold on Steam. The condition of the game at release was not even alpha-quality. Bug infested, with so much not working it was laughable. Even now, after a few patches it is still garbage, and the community has died.
  • Read full review

User Review

quekwoambojish, Metacritic
10 April 2012
  • Summary: I have made a metacritic account, and asked Steam for a refund upon playing Gettysburg: Armored Warfare. I am a huge fan of indie devs, and I uphold gameplay above all else. It is very rare that I would rate a game so poorly.
  • Read full review

User Review

veraceszk, Metacritic
6 April 2012
  • Summary: This is quite possibly the worst game I have ever played. The developer even said "you get what you pay for", well, I beg to differ. I didn't pay for a pre-alpha game (as this one appears to be).
  • Read full review

User Review

nirvycn, Metacritic
31 March 2012
  • Summary: Buyer Beware!! Buggy, unfinished, crashes all the time, poor graphics, no tutorial. This really is one of th epoorest games i have been suckered into playing, it really is THAT bad. Yes its made by a one man team, yes its only £8.99 but its not worth it.
  • Read full review

User Review

Tyrrell82, Metacritic
30 March 2012
  • Summary: This game is rubbish. I consider myself a long time gamer. I have been around since the Commodor 64. Though it is rare that I see a game this bad. The game play is terrible, there is an abundance of glitches and quite frankly, the game is just plain boring.
  • Read full review

User Review

Cleanhead, Metacritic
29 March 2012
  • Summary: Nothing could prepare me for how poor this game is in all aspects. I realise it was 9.99 on release and had 1 developer, but that to me is no excuse for a game so diabolically bad in aiming, movement, AI intelligence (most dont even fire at you, just run passed you under fire) and the RTS element...
  • Read full review

User Review

ChairmanWU, Metacritic
28 March 2012
  • Summary: Gettysburg, armored warfare. This is a classic example of a game with good ideas, unique gameplay(combining RTS and FPS) that was ruined by a massive amount of glitches and bugs, clumsy controls and a non-existent tutorial.
  • Read full review

User Review

Amp834, Metacritic
27 March 2012
  • Summary: Good intentions... Bad Glitches. No spawn menu I found that clicking on units in my teams spawn was the only way to spawn. I really hope there are updates for this game i think it could be awesome even the 3rd person.. for those of you who hate third person stop playing gears of war...
  • Read full review