www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Gettysburg-armored-warfare.33701759
4.8 out of 10

Gettysburg: Armored Warfare

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Gettysburg: Armored Warfare

Showing 1-10 of 10

User Review

Etocholes, Metacritic
30 May 2012
  • Summary: I used to believe no game deserved a 0...then i played Gettysburg. To Wood431, who gave this game an 8, and to the other person who gave this game a 7, hell to anyone who gave above a 0, SHAME. ON. YOU! Wood431 must be the game creator's mother, and even she should be ashamed for encouraging her obviously brain dead son to continue to make crap like this. This game is a disgrace. Wait, I used to believe no game deserved a 0...then i played Gettysburg.
  • Read full review

User Review

Discord, Metacritic
19 May 2012
  • Summary: It has some interesting concepts, but unfortunately seems to have been pushed into release too early. The developer/player interaction in the Steam forums for the game is great, however. Had the developer been given more time he probably could have released a solid game.
  • Read full review

User Review

ScreamingWargod, Metacritic
15 May 2012
  • Summary: This is by far the worst garbage that I've seen that has ever been sold on Steam. The condition of the game at release was not even alpha-quality. Bug infested, with so much not working it was laughable. Even now, after a few patches it is still garbage, and the community has died. Nobody is playing it anymore. Avoid radioactive software like the HIV-virus. Never buy anything from them This is by far the worst garbage that I've seen that has ever been sold on Steam.
  • Read full review

User Review

quekwoambojish, Metacritic
10 April 2012
  • Summary: I have made a metacritic account, and asked Steam for a refund upon playing Gettysburg: Armored Warfare. I am a huge fan of indie devs, and I uphold gameplay above all else. It is very rare that I would rate a game so poorly. Let's now get to the point: Graphics- Gettysburg has pretty graphics in the screenshots, but this is a horrible HORRIBLE HOOOORIBAH misconception.
  • Read full review

User Review

veraceszk, Metacritic
6 April 2012
  • Summary: This is quite possibly the worst game I have ever played. The developer even said "you get what you pay for", well, I beg to differ. I didn't pay for a pre-alpha game (as this one appears to be). It claims to be a strategy game with many features virtually nonexistent, the worst animations I've ever seen, and the worst server-side lag I've ever seen. The developer keeps making excuses for This is quite possibly the worst game I have ever played.
  • Read full review

User Review

nirvycn, Metacritic
31 March 2012
  • Summary: Buyer Beware!! Buggy, unfinished, crashes all the time, poor graphics, no tutorial. This really is one of th epoorest games i have been suckered into playing, it really is THAT bad. Yes its made by a one man team, yes its only £8.99 but its not worth it. No way on earth the one man dev team can EVER fix the huge amounts of bugs, glitches and crashes in this game.
  • Read full review

User Review

Tyrrell82, Metacritic
30 March 2012
  • Summary: This game is rubbish. I consider myself a long time gamer. I have been around since the Commodor 64. Though it is rare that I see a game this bad. The game play is terrible, there is an abundance of glitches and quite frankly, the game is just plain boring. I'd recommend nobody support the publisher, or the developer by buying a copy of this. We honestly deserve better than this garbage. I This game is rubbish. I consider myself a long time gamer.
  • Read full review

User Review

Cleanhead, Metacritic
29 March 2012
  • Summary: Nothing could prepare me for how poor this game is in all aspects. I realise it was 9.99 on release and had 1 developer, but that to me is no excuse for a game so diabolically bad in aiming, movement, AI intelligence (most dont even fire at you, just run passed you under fire) and the RTS element was practically as basic as you can get. Maybe after a patch or 10 it will be playable but as Nothing could prepare me for how poor this game is in all aspects.
  • Read full review

User Review

ChairmanWU, Metacritic
28 March 2012
  • Summary: Gettysburg, armored warfare. This is a classic example of a game with good ideas, unique gameplay(combining RTS and FPS) that was ruined by a massive amount of glitches and bugs, clumsy controls and a non-existent tutorial. Even though the game has a low price tag, it does not make up for the fact that this product is uncompleted. If we, the players, allow this game to get a pass because Gettysburg, armored warfare.
  • Read full review

User Review

Amp834, Metacritic
27 March 2012
  • Summary: Good intentions... Bad Glitches. No spawn menu I found that clicking on units in my teams spawn was the only way to spawn. I really hope there are updates for this game i think it could be awesome even the 3rd person.. for those of you who hate third person stop playing gears of war... sorry had to say it to many people in the server trashing 3rd person and saying they where gonna play Good intentions... Bad Glitches.
  • Read full review