Reviews and Problems with Gettysburg: Armored Warfare
Showing 1-4 of 4
Joint Gettysburg Review by GD Admin
15 April 2012
Excerpt: First off let us draw your attention to the fact that one man, Danny Green/Radioactive Software, worked hard to bring this ambitious third-person/RTS hybrid to the PC gaming world. This was done in about 1 year.
Pros: Large Maps, Great Concept
Cons: Large Maps, Limited Control Options, No Players Online
Gettysburg: Armored Warfare is a busted online real-time strategy/third-person shooter hybrid that falters despite its cool premise.
13 April 2012
Summary: Imagine how the Civil War might have played out if the battle of Gettysburg had been fought with armored tanks and flying zeppelins instead of cannons and cavalry. Radioactive Software's inventive pairing of futuristic weaponry and historical 1860s-era warfare is enough to make Gettysburg: Armored...
Pros: Futuristic Civil War is a rad concept
Cons: RTS combat is broken, Numerous visual glitches and bugs, Game feels unfinished in most areas, Limited maps and play modes
Summary: "Radioactive Software a Paradox Interactive vytvoøili online RTS Gettysburg: Armored Warfare, ve které se podíváme do jakési obèanské války v Americe. Kromì jiného nabídne rovnìž bitvy dvou rùzných týmù s maximálním poètem hráèù, kterých mùže být 32 a vyspìlé zbranì z roku 2060..."