www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Command-and-conquer-4.33786218
6.7 out of 10

Command and Conquer 4

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Command and Conquer 4

Showing 1-10 of 97

User Review

Armotekma, Metacritic
26 June 2014
  • Summary: Once upon a time, a friend an I made a very bad uninformed purchase. We bought C&C4 thinking it would be a better C&C3. The first and last time we played this, an inside joke was born. The only thing I remember about this game was that horribly laggy cutscene.. OMG A MISISLE!1!11111111!!
  • Read full review

User Review

Dacoda, Metacritic
17 May 2013
  • Summary: Where do I begin. The worse always-online DRM? Maybe. The lack of any resource management? Also a good point. But the worst thing remains that the completely messed up a story that was so interesting to follow in the previous installment of the C&C series. Also, the units look worse and less realistic than they used to. The strategic element of the game that made C&C3 great is also mostly Where do I begin. The worse always-online DRM? Maybe.
  • Read full review

User Review

armchairjerk, Metacritic
9 May 2013
  • Summary: Dont! STOP! these are the words i said as my memories of C&C where raped. I can say little about this game that is positive, I am just glad i bought it for 1 buck. I really dont understand how this game even got a 64 from the critics. AVOID AT ALL COSTS, NOT EVEN WORTH IT FOR THE STORY.
  • Read full review

User Review

syphmonkey, Metacritic
20 March 2013
  • Summary: A garbage ending o a phenomenal series. The only thing familiar here are the cut scenes as everything else has been remodeled from scratch. This makes it not c&c at all. The game play is shoddy, the learning curve steep and unit count very low. You have to be online in order to progress too making it frustrating as hell when your internet connection is lost for few seconds 40 minutes into A garbage ending o a phenomenal series.
  • Read full review

User Review

faceless-1, Metacritic
26 December 2012
  • Summary: EA just totally ruined command and conquer. This game is one of the most disappointing strategy games i ever played. The game play is total **** You can make good game without base management (DoW II), but in this case its total garbage and Command and Conquer is 50% about base building. In compare to tiberian sun of even tiberian wars this game is total WtF.
  • Read full review

User Review

Victory, Metacritic
11 December 2012
  • Summary: Legitimately one of the worst games I have ever had the misfortune of playing. The game is terrible, the gameplay is terrible and the graphics are terrible. It chugs and I get slow down on my rig which runs Skyrim on ultra at 60fps. This is inexcusable. I tried so hard to play this game but I couldn't manage more than an hour, it's that bad. What a total excuse for a command and Legitimately one of the worst games I have ever had the misfortune of playing.
  • Read full review

User Review

kanefriessner, Metacritic
21 July 2012
  • Summary: A bad ending of a great game series. The idiot and boring storytelling, also the idiot and boring story, the missing base building and management, the missing resource management and also the missing of the money are killing this game. You have only 1 "building" (called "Crawler") that can move like a big robot. You can choose from 3 Crawler types: Defensive, Attacking and Support. I think A bad ending of a great game series.
  • Read full review

User Review

Anticept, Metacritic
27 February 2011
  • Summary: It's not a terrible game standing by itself, but it's barely worth 10 dollars with the C&C title on it. Even when standing on it's own merits, it's still quite a generic game, and the cutscenes are dry and uninteresting. Kane, normally an intimidating and wise character, feels dead in this one. He doesn't have that shroud of mystery that was normally maintained in previous series.
  • Read full review

User Review

DAwG4Hire, Metacritic
14 January 2011
  • Summary: I don't know if I even want to finish this. This was a giant waste of my 5$ off of a steam deal. It feels like something some no-name developer puts out, but with decent graphics. There's no resource management. All it is is rock/paper/scissors, but with 3 or 4 different people putting their hands in. As everyone else has stated, this is not C&C. It doesn't deserve to be anywhere I don't know if I even want to finish this.
  • Read full review

User Review

capthavic, Metacritic
14 August 2010
  • Summary: Purely and simply this is NOT Command and Conquer. No base building, no resource management, and no strategy at all. Just pump out a bunch of cannon fodder and if they die just pump out a few more at no cost. Joe Kucan is the only noteworthy actor and even he phones it in. The cutscenes are just bad and not in the usual so cheesy its good way. The DRM is just the cherry on this giant **** Purely and simply this is NOT Command and Conquer.
  • Read full review
Next page >>