www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Command and Conquer 4
6.6 out of 10

Command and Conquer 4

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Command and Conquer 4

Showing 1-10 of 73

User Review

syphmonkey, Metacritic
20 March 2013
  • Summary: A garbage ending o a phenomenal series. The only thing familiar here are the cut scenes as everything else has been remodeled from scratch. This makes it not c&c at all. The game play is shoddy, the learning curve steep and unit count very low.
  • Read full review

User Review

faceless-1, Metacritic
26 December 2012
  • Summary: EA just totally ruined command and conquer. This game is one of the most disappointing strategy games i ever played. The game play is total **** You can make good game without base management (DoW II), but in this case its total garbage and Command and Conquer is 50% about base building.
  • Read full review

User Review

kanefriessner, Metacritic
21 July 2012
  • Summary: A bad ending of a great game series. The idiot and boring storytelling, also the idiot and boring story, the missing base building and management, the missing resource management and also the missing of the money are killing this game.
  • Read full review

User Review

DAwG4Hire, Metacritic
14 January 2011
  • Summary: I don't know if I even want to finish this. This was a giant waste of my 5$ off of a steam deal. It feels like something some no-name developer puts out, but with decent graphics. There's no resource management.
  • Read full review

User Review

capthavic, Metacritic
14 August 2010
  • Summary: Purely and simply this is NOT Command and Conquer. No base building, no resource management, and no strategy at all. Just pump out a bunch of cannon fodder and if they die just pump out a few more at no cost. Joe Kucan is the only noteworthy actor and even he phones it in.
  • Read full review

User Review

ShaneL., Metacritic
19 April 2010
  • Summary: Okay so I have played C&C since the beging so I am well and truly a fan, I have played all of the saga with the expansions. Since EA took over with Generals and Zero Hour (which was okay but had no cut-scenes) they have done nothing but ruin the game, When they released C&C3 and Kanes Wrath I...
  • Read full review

User Review

JamesW., Metacritic
17 April 2010
  • Summary: As both an RTS fan and a huge C&C fan I have to ask what exactly the hell EA were doing when they released this, but of course the answer is once again rushing a product out of the door in an effort to make more money.
  • Read full review

User Review

DRitz, Metacritic
12 April 2010
  • Summary: The game itself would not have been that bad if it were a new IP or an offshoot of the C&C Brand (Like a multi-player only side-game) but C&C 4 was supposed to be the grand fanale of the traditional RTS, not some knock off.
  • Read full review

User Review

MikeT, Metacritic
25 March 2010
  • Summary: The one who decided starting a game at lowest settings 800*600 should have been sacked last year. A lot of the fire the game have for "less than adequate" graphics comes from this ****** up setting?!?! That aside, this isn't c&c at all.
  • Read full review

User Review

Jayfive, Metacritic
23 March 2010
  • Summary: It's a shame to watch a gaming company use a beloved franchise as a test tube for a new concept in gaming. If you want to create a new idea for the existing story (Renegade) go right ahead, but be honest about it. Suggesting that this is a direct sequel to C&C is laughable.
  • Read full review
Next page >>