Summary: Game is scenic with lots of options for buildings....but it becomes quite repetitive very quickly. Game mixes Civilization with Simcity, but comes up short compared to both games. I think Ill stick to my Civ 4.
Summary: I am truly sorry for this game. I loved Firefly's Stronghold, but lately, they have no luck with 3d engines. This game is plain ugly, so if you are looking for a citybuilder with an atmosphere, look someplace else.
Summary: I brought this after having played Caesar3 and loved it but wanted something with a bit more scope for controlling dynamics of a city - and I thought being a civcity game this would offer me the extension - WRONG - this is a bad rip off of Caesar3, sure, graphics are more advanced with the zoom in...
Summary: I bought as a way to pass the time, the graphics are good but game play is difficult. I cannot get the map editor to work and trading is very limited. For serious players, I would not recommend this game.
Summary: We have all witnessed the triumphs of titles such as Civilisation and its sequels, but Civ City has nothing new to bring to the table. In fact, it appears to bring nothing to the table at all.
Summary: I love all the Civs, but this game does not live up to that heritage. The space you are given to build your village/city etc is much too small, you have to knock things down to build other things rather than develop the city to something bigger and better.
Summary: I had high expectations for Civcity Rome because I like strategy games of different types. First off the Graphics are ok, but they are no way outstanding. Games such as Age of empires 3 really put the graphics in CivCity Rome to shame. Graphics are not everything, so how do I rate the gameplay?