www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Call of Duty 2
7.2 out of 10

Call of Duty 2

The sequel to Infinity Ward's 2003 Game of the Year, Call of Dut Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Call of Duty 2

Showing 1-10 of 43
Overall 6
6.0

Fun game

rick, Amazon
22 February 2014
  • Summary: The only reason I don't give this a higher rating is that while playing the game, the video goes awry. This does not make play impossible, but does take away from the the fun. This video problem is limited to this game.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Call of Duty 2 [Mac Download]

Tim D, Amazon
22 April 2012
  • Summary: Had lots of fun planing the game. Did have some performance issue on my iMac 2.8 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo with 4 GB 800 MHz DDR2 SDRAM and ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro 256 MB video.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Loved it with exceptions.

Sebastian Matthews, Amazon
11 September 2009
  • Summary: This is another game that most of it worked but some levels needed to be skipped because they just wouldn't load. The Call of Duty 2 part worked flawlessly.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Great 1st time around, but replayability is poor

Amazon Customer, Amazon
15 June 2008
  • Summary: Title says it all. I really enjoyed this game the first run through. It's cinematic and engaging and challenging. The second time around was no fun at all because everything is the same, I mean exactly the same down to the timing of the attacks and 'surprises'. Sorry, can't recommend this.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Decent but not spectacular

Spendsters, Amazon
28 September 2007
  • Summary: Call of Duty is a decent game by all accounts. I have played many, many, many video games over the years and this one is about average in my estimation. I found the controls to be somewhat frustrating at times, and the plot was rather lame (world war 2 again???).
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

When a console port goes wrong

C. C. Ingersoll, Amazon
6 June 2007
  • Summary: For the record I have always preferred Call of Duty to Metal of Honor. The weapons in CoD~1 were responded better, the graphics and maps seemed better to me. I knew from the first second I opened this box that I had made a bad mistake and didn't trust the negative reviews here: HALF the game manual...
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Good, but with some disappointments

Archelon, Amazon
25 August 2006
  • Summary: It looks and sounds good. It takes advantage of the wide screen video modes that graphics cards have been capable of for the last couple of years and CORRECTLY renders the proportions of everything. There are some games that take the easy way out by simply stretching everything.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

not as good as everyone says

D. Vai, Amazon
22 March 2006
  • Summary: if you own fear or quake 4 you know what im talking about... this game was not as good as all the hype.... go get quake 4 or fear... bot were far better than cod2.... i stopped [playing this game after 4 missions... too repetitive... find cover shoot.... find cover....
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

A good Call of Duty 1.5, but...

Jonathan S. "Jonathan_S", Amazon
10 January 2006
  • Summary: A good refinement of the original CoD ethic, with enhanced effects, more constant action, and numerous little touch-ups to the gameplay. The automatic healing system was a bold change, and I think a big improvement.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Does what it says on the box, but not for very long...

Stephen Ellwood "Squishy", Amazon
28 December 2005
  • Summary: I've played the orignal COD and almost all of the FP Shooters of the last few years. I got this game for Christmas, and was finished with the single player missions 2 days later, which makes it one of the shortest FPS I have ever played. Having said that it beats Quake 4 hands down for playability.
  • Read full review
Next page >>