www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Battlefield 1942
6.4 out of 10

Battlefield 1942

Choisissez votre arme et partez en campagne avec la trilogie com Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Battlefield 1942

Showing 1-10 of 20
Overall 4
4.0

... and style of play - game looks to be good if it fits your style

Rich Evans, Amazon
24 December 2014
  • Summary: Call of Duty and Medal of Honor mush more to my liking and style of play - game looks to be good if it fits your style. --Rich
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

I should have read the reviews Battlefield 1942

rtwedd, Amazon
31 December 2010
  • Summary: Will not run in Windows 7, I changed properties to have run in XP mode, it worked but poorly. I will give it to someone using Vista. That's if any such people still exist.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Two Stars

Mr. K. M. Groves, Amazon
20 August 2014
Overall 4
4.0

Early game but still poor

Old Soldier, Amazon
14 March 2014
  • Summary: Having played the early COD I had these would at least be as good. They are childish, poorly made and completely unrealistic, even for 2003/3 era games. A waste of money for anyone who has played proper FSP games. Sorry but its true
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Average game

jam66, Amazon
29 August 2008
  • Summary: Bought this after playing COD1 expansion pack online for a few years. 1942 is poor by comparison. Detail is average and gameplay is no where near as good. Was bored after a couple of hours. COD is far better, even the first game, play it online and you'll be hooked.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

If you love CALL OF DUTY mulitplayer dont buy this

M. Knight "hapo888", Amazon
22 May 2005
  • Summary: I know this game has a huge following and i respectfully aknowledge its place in multiplayer history. My first forays into military multiplayer gaming were Call of Duty and its sequel United Offensive.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Battlefield 1942: Waste of Money

Amazon
6 March 2004
  • Summary: Okay....I'll have trouble about what bad quality of the game to address first, but I'll start with the historical accuracy. Start the game as Allies. The fist mission, Operation Battleaxe, is NOT ACCURATE HISTORICALLY AT ALL!!!!
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Umm...Try again, EA!

Robert L. Schertz, Amazon
19 February 2004
  • Summary: C'mon. This game has a great interface and all...but a 30 second spawn wait in single player?! That is absurd. The only reason I am giving this two stars is because of the vehicles. You can get in every vehicle. That is the only good point. The AI is awful. They will not even engage in melees.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

How did this get past QA?

Chris, Amazon
20 December 2003
  • Summary: Ahh, Battlefield 1942. What postive things have been said about this game that have not already been said? It has already won high praise from many gaming magazines as well as several "Game of the Year" awards.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Fun, but only after adjusting to the lameness

Eric G. Wilkinson, Amazon
17 November 2003
  • Summary: Battlefield 1942: Single player: * No gore. A disturbing trend in WW2 games: bloodless war. I guess we can't make our kids think war is cool and send them off to Iraq if we let them see war as hell. * Horrible enemy AI.
  • Read full review
Next page >>