Summary: Having played the early COD I had these would at least be as good. They are childish, poorly made and completely unrealistic, even for 2003/3 era games. A waste of money for anyone who has played proper FSP games.
Summary: Bought this after playing COD1 expansion pack online for a few years. 1942 is poor by comparison. Detail is average and gameplay is no where near as good. Was bored after a couple of hours. COD is far better, even the first game, play it online and you'll be hooked.
If you love CALL OF DUTY mulitplayer dont buy this
M. Knight "hapo888", Amazon
22 May 2005
Summary: I know this game has a huge following and i respectfully aknowledge its place in multiplayer history. My first forays into military multiplayer gaming were Call of Duty and its sequel United Offensive.
Summary: Ahh, Battlefield 1942. What postive things have been said about this game that have not already been said? It has already won high praise from many gaming magazines as well as several "Game of the Year" awards.
Summary: Battlefield 1942: Single player: * No gore. A disturbing trend in WW2 games: bloodless war. I guess we can't make our kids think war is cool and send them off to Iraq if we let them see war as hell. * Horrible enemy AI.
This game is a twinkee... great taste, no substance.
Kyle Nelsen, Amazon
28 May 2003
Summary: Two of my favorite types of games are First-Person Shooters and Flight Simulators, naturally this game grabbed me right away and I bought it. I thought it was the greatest thing out there... for the first two weeks then I went back to Day of Defeat....
Summary: BattleField 1942 kom ut 2002 och är ett 1 person shoot em up spel (vilket betyder att när du kollar på skärmen så ser du genom karraktärens ögon) Jag kommer ihåg hur uppskrivet detta spel var innan det kom, och jag bland många väntade ett snabbt, roligt och väldigt snyggt spel. När jag väl fick...