www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Kodak EASYSHARE 5300 All-in-One Printer
4.5 out of 10

Kodak EASYSHARE 5300 All-in-One Printer

Fantastic prints don't need to be expensive. Kodak has Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Kodak EASYSHARE 5300 All-in-One Printer

Showing 1-10 of 33
Overall 2
2.0

Kodak EasyShare 5300

jacqui5501, CNET
28 December 2008
  • Summary: These have a problem with the printer head, I had to change mine twice in the first 6 months, by the time it went a third time, I changed the printer...
  • Pros: The ink is cheaper than most printer inks.
  • Cons: The quality isn't as good as I was told in the shop..
  • Read full review

Kodak Easyshare 5300

blogger79, ReviewStream
22 February 2008
  • Excerpt: Kodak Easyshare 5300 is a laser printer that I find to be extremely cool and easy to use. I have this one at home and the price is not that bad. It is extremely convenient and do not make the normal noise that a printer would like …
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Great photos and great value ink.

Redmond, Dooyoo
11 August 2011
  • Excerpt: Price I paid : 163Euro that's around £140 Kodak good for cameras and pictures, right? So it makes perfect sense that they would be able to make a good printer. Right? Well there are lots of companies that excel in one field and fail in another.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Good printer, good points far outweigh the bad

dammy8248, Dooyoo
30 November 2010
  • Excerpt: This printer is one in a range that Kodak launched a few years ago to try and get themselves into the home printing market and not just specialised photo stuff. It's main selling point being the cheap price of the ink. I've had mine for about 10 months and its worked almost faultlessly.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

A good all rounder

SoadFan, Dooyoo
6 October 2010
  • Excerpt: Whilst looking for a replacement printer to take the place of the failed and if I am completely honest, very poor and ink thirsty, Lexmark printer we had at the time, the Kodak 5300 Easy Share Ink Jet Printer, was one of the ink jet printers that really caught my eye.
  • Pros: Reliability
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

An excellent all in one machine.

tleefox, Dooyoo
8 July 2010
  • Excerpt: I have had one of these for about the last 2 years now - original purchase price was £140 from memory from PC World, and I have been nothing but impressed with it. Thew first thing to note is that as far as all in one's go, this is quite a large machine and there are smaller options out there - if...
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

There is better.

Pammie-annie, Dooyoo
5 August 2009
  • Excerpt: The Kodak Easyshare 5300 is a very nice and easy printer. Very smart and compact, since I have one in my room. Not massive and not tiny, just a decent size. The out-come is brilliant, very crisp and pristine, but this printer isn't the fastest of all.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

User Review

jacqui55, Cnet.co.uk
28 December 2008
  • Summary: These have a problem with the printer head, I had to change mine twice in the first 6 months, by the time it went a third time, I changed the printer...
  • Pros: The ink is cheaper than most printer inks.
  • Cons: The quality isn't as good as I was told in the shop..
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Never buy one.

robin.jj, Dooyoo
16 October 2008
  • Excerpt: I've had a 5300 for about 18 months. Actually I've had two, the first gave up printing black after a few months. After much groaning at PC World they gave me a second - despite the "you have to deal with Kodak line".
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0
Value for money 10
10
Ease of use 8
8.0
Picture quality 10
10
Options 8
8.0
Color and saturation 10
10

A great printer for the price

minibus10, Ciao
17 August 2008
  • Excerpt: I have recently purchased the Kodak Easy share 5300 to replace my Hp Photo smart,this was due to the rising costs in ink cartridges.The ink for this model cost a very reasonable £6.99 for black and £9.99 for colour.
  • Pros: Cheaper ink cartridges
  • Cons: none for me
  • Read full review
Next page >>