www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Canon imageCLASS MF5550
4.2 out of 10

Canon imageCLASS MF5550

If your looking to move up from a single function copier, printe Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Canon imageCLASS MF5550

Showing 1-5 of 5
Overall 2
2.0

Terrible Paper Jams

Tacul, Amazon
10 March 2008
  • Summary: This printer will not feed paper through the paper tray. It will only feed paper one at a time through the slot. The paper trapy stopped working within a week of when I purchased it. It is almost useless without a working paper feeding mechanism.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

great scaner great copyer don't by it for the fax

A. Johnson, Amazon
8 July 2005
  • Summary: I have owned one for about a year and only successfully faxed something once. If I want something faxed it takes less time to go to Kinko's and fax it. I have spent enough faxing things to by a new fax machine.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Canon MF5550 Multifunction

R. E. Haas "natural neighbor", Amazon
3 April 2005
  • Summary: This product is referred to as a "prototype" Well--that's all it should have been--it should have never gotten through the exit doors at Canon. I spoke with a Canon customer service rep. about this product and he said "That's what we get for having someone else design it for us.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

DO NOT BUY THE MF5550 - KNOWN PROBLEMS

Anthony Beltz, Amazon
7 December 2004
  • Summary: I purchased the MF5550 to replace my old hp inkjet fax machine. Out of the box employees were complaining that they were having problems faxing. Talking to tech support they said that the MF5550 is not compatible with all fax machines.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Should not be in production -- major paper handling problems

who1zep, Amazon
25 February 2004
  • Summary: I had been looking at multi-function devices (MFDs) for a little over one year. One of the things that delayed my purchase is that the all-in-one machines are usually a generation or two behind in technology.
  • Read full review