www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Brother MFC-J4410DW
8.3 out of 10

Brother MFC-J4410DW

Fast Speeds, Compact and Low Cost Printing Brother is proud to i Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Brother MFC-J4410DW

Showing 1-10 of 271
Overall 4
4.0

Planning to replace - better options out there

Neal, Amazon
9 January 2015
  • Summary: This printer is good enough - it prints, it can do duplex, it has wireless capabilities, and I was won over by the 11x17 printing option (which I have never actually used). But, it's shortcomings have been steadily getting more and more frustrating.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Disappointing performance all-around

Minnie I., Amazon
7 December 2014
  • Summary: I have had this printer for more than a year and compared to other printers I have had, this is a real loser. Here are my reasons: 1) Print color is faded and unpredictable. You can mess with the color settings and try to get a vivid print, but mostly you're going to end up with colors with little...
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

A disaster from the very beginning.

Dr. Hanna Ian, Amazon
16 July 2014
  • Summary: A disaster from the very beginning. 1. The unit would continually paper jam from the paper tray in 1 out of every 3 or 4 prints. 2. The unit would continually take two pieces of paper, printing the whole document on both pages - left margin of the one piece of paper (below) and the other piece of...
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Lazy and undependable

Brett Walters, Amazon
3 July 2014
  • Summary: It works...sometimes. I don't have any issues with jamming or on the scanning feature, but sometimes it will take 5 minutes to print a two page job or it will decide it doesn't want to print anything at all. Very frustrating. Color print quality is decent when it does feel like working.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Not so good

James N Morrison, Amazon
11 April 2014
  • Summary: Have used Brother Laser printers for years. This is my first Brother Inkjet. Specs say many pages per minute in color. That may be true as long as you disregard the 7-10 second delay due to paper loading. The paper loading as a landscape mode is really a good idea ( idea=10).
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

The worst, the very worst printer decision I ever made.

Gilagrump, Amazon
25 March 2014
  • Summary: The printer does what it says it will . . . . sometimes. It is large, heavy and difficult to use. The side-sheet paper feed jams with anything but perfect 20 lb paper. Don't even think of printing with heavier stock or perforated stock such as perforated checks.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Well worth the purchase

STEEL, J&R
21 March 2014
  • Excerpt: Pretty much self explanatory and manageable by ones self
  • Pros: Compact Design, Durable construction, Easy To Set Up, Easy To Use, Fast Print Time, Low Ink Consumption, Reliable
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

I have used Brother Products for many years...

William H. Stoneman, Amazon
13 March 2014
  • Summary: The Brother MFCJ4410 DW has proved to be the most difficult installation of any product I have ever encountered. It has taken three days...and numerous contacts with computer professionals and Brother themselves...and I am still not working up to speed. My scanner driver doesn't respond...
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Doesn't quite do the job

John F. Schad, Amazon
13 March 2014
  • Summary: Our main purpose in purchasing this printer was to have an easy way to automatically scan checks we receive in the mail every day and prepare a daily pdf file of those checks. Unfortunately the checks do not feed properly through the feed device and are often crumpled or even ripped when we pry them...
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Do not buy

TKS, Amazon
9 February 2014
  • Summary: Great features works fantastic but the print quality is horrible. I sent the first one back after spending an hour with brother tech support reloading software etc. Nothing made the print quality better so I exchanged it for a new one hoping is was defective.
  • Read full review
Next page >>