It didn't work properly. I called Brother and what ...
28 August 2014
Summary: It didn't work properly. I called Brother and what a pain that was! After being disconnected 3 times with customer service and explaining the problem 3 times finally have it resolved. Brother is sending a replacement unit. Let's see if it arrives ? Just did this yesterday. I'm hopeful.
Absolutely the worst computer peripheral I've ever owned
17 March 2012
Summary: I cannot say enough bad things about this printer. It's expensive, uses ink faster than an airplane uses fuel, takes an eternity to begin printing, smudges ink on the corners of most documents and jams literally 99% of the time.
Summary: The printer has some nice features but the quality is far from what I am used to. I have worked in the I.T. field for 16 years and have never seen anything like this. The first time I printed some color documents on it I noticed the quality was not as bold as on the HP laser printers, but it was ok.
WINNER OF ONE OF THE WORSE MACHINES AND SERVICE F+
Martin Pichinson "shrwood", Amazon
16 April 2010
Summary: I have had many Brother MFC machines. They finally came up with a winner (i.e. Toyota). From the first time I used this unit, paper jam after paper jam, after paper jam and there was never any paper jammed. SO...I guess "You can't fix stupid" and I have the dumb machine.
Summary: All I can say is toners keep spewing powder causing lines down paper. Drum units have packed up after a few months and colours are faded and drab. Constant errors and in a nutshell this machine is a pain in the backside. Wish I had never purchased it!!! Don't bother!!!
Summary: Noch 13 Monaten musste man schon das Transferband wechslen, was so nebenbei € 200.- kostet. Man hat mit gesagt, dass man noch 50.000 Blättern ein neues braucht, habe aber zu diesen Zeitpunkt gerade mal 19.000 Blätter gedruckt.
Summary: Ich suchte einen Drucker, der sowohl vernünftige Ausdrucke ermöglicht als auch kostenmäßig im Rahmen ist und zusätzlich die Scan to Mail Funktion hat. Leider musste ich feststellen, das Scan to Mail nicht gleich Scan to Mail bedeutet.