Reviews, reviews, reviews...

7.5 out of 10

Transcend 400x CF

Dedicated to fulfill the demanding requirements of performance-c Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Transcend 400x CF

Showing 1-5 of 5
Overall 4

Died after 18 months

Daniel B., Newegg
30 April 2012
  • Pros: Value (capacity+speed for the price) is good. Worked well for the first 18 months.
  • Cons: Data corruption (unrecoverable read errors) started occurring after 18 months.
  • Read full review
Overall 4

Nowhere near 400x

F M., Newegg
6 January 2011
  • Summary: I also timed large file transfers with similar results to the above benchmark tests. Transcend advertises this as 400 X which is 60 MB per second then further says it is only 60 MB per second in read and is only 30 MB per second and write. Actual tests indicate that it is approximately half that speed.
  • Pros: It works
  • Cons: Performance is nowhere near what is advertised. After noting slow performance in my Nikon D 300 S, I benchmarked with ATTO and with flash memory toolkit. The memory tests at a maximum of 20 MB per second write and 32 MB per second read. This translates to 133X write speed and 200 X read speed. I am very disappointed and am returning to Newegg.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
Value for money 4
Ease of use 6


Nelson , Conrad
11 November 2011
  • Summary: Het lijkt wel of de kaart af en toe wat moeite heeft met het wegschrijven van HD film. Wat ik bij mijn andere CF card van een ander merk niet had.
  • Pros: goedkoop
  • Cons: problemen met wegschrijven
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 4


Babusuresh, priceminister.com
15 July 2011
Overall 4


darko, amazon.es
31 October 2010