Summary: ok first of all this game has never portrayed itself as a realistic super realism shooter. its a first person shooter , and a very good one at that. ive played realistic games (ww2 online ) and they suck because they are too "realistic ".
Summary: The overall concept of the game is very good, but there is more to be desired. First the graphics are only so-so, but that can be expected beceause it is an online game where the more complex the graphics are the more laggy it will be.
Summary: This game is cool!!! It has great graphics, realistic battles, neat vehicles, and more. This is a WWII game, you acting as a soldier in the Japanese, American, Russian, German, or British army. You have a choice of being 1 of 5 types of soldiers: medic, assualt, engineer, anti tank, and scout.
Summary: Excellent game but definitely NOT what it was hyped up to be. I finished the single player campaign in 6 hours(yes its just that easy to do on the average setting) and realized in that time that my teamates AI was terrible-they were standing there shooting at prone targets 6 feet away from them and...
Summary: This is a solid ww2 pc game, no doubt about it. You have reasonably good control of your sides' bots, and you can generally tell them to hold a position or attack. There are some drawbacks though.
Summary: When rating this game, I didn't want to give it a Perfect 5, but then it is better than a mere 4, so I would like to customize the rating process and give it a solid 4.5. Here is my justification of such a complimentary score: I have played this game on a somewhat limited basis and all I can say is...
Summary: This game is for people who just want an arena to fight in. The game contains no real mission and therefore no scripting. The absence of scripting can be good because it basically deletes predictability. I, for one like having a mission. I know I gave it 4 stars... but it's closer to a 3.