www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Tamron SP AF 70-200mm F2.8 Di LD (IF) Macro
8.6 out of 10

Tamron SP AF 70-200mm F2.8 Di LD (IF) Macro

While overall dimensions are confined to the absolute minimum, t Read more

Great Deal: $769.00

Reviews and Problems with Tamron SP AF 70-200mm F2.8 Di LD (IF) Macro

Showing 1-10 of 500
Overall 8
8.0

Nice lens

Mark, B&H Photo
31 May 2015
  • Excerpt: I bought this lens because of the price and that I had a very good experience with my last Tamron lens. I have been using this for mostly still life and some portraits. It works perfectly and the image quality is spectacular.
  • Pros: Consistent Output, Durable, Easily Interchangeable, Lightweight, Nice Bokeh, Strong Construction
  • Cons: Slow Focus
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Very Good Deal

teedawg83, B&H Photo
12 May 2015
  • Excerpt: OK, maybe not quite as fast as the comparable Nikon "cheap" f2.8 lens, but a good lens for the budget-conscious photographer who wants to get professional-quality shots without a high price tag. Great bokeh for portraits, wildlife shots, etc.
  • Pros: Consistent Output, Durable, Nice Bokeh, Strong Construction
  • Cons: Slow Focus
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Perfection

Scott, B&H Photo
6 May 2015
  • Excerpt: The lens performed as expected and the some. Thus is not the VR version but I had no issues with stability and focus. The images are crisp and focus is spot on. The lens is a little heavy, but I knew that going into it. I would recommend this lens!
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Decent Lens

schmilly, B&H Photo
1 May 2015
  • Excerpt: I love the look of this lens- discreet and no fancy buttons all over the place. The picture quality is great, but you would have to shoot at a high shutter speed to avoid camera shake since there's no stabilizer. The only thing that bugs me is the auto focus which takes quite awhile to focus.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

good lens

Billh, B&H Photo
13 April 2015
  • Excerpt: Good lens for lots of things. I have a 16-50 2.8 and often wished I had more zoom. this fits the bill. works well for distance street shots and has a close focus distance for detail shooting. a little noisy but I knew that before I bought.
  • Pros: Consistent Output, Durable, Lightweight, Nice Bokeh, Strong Construction
  • Cons: Slow Focus
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

New Toy

Softball Pics, B&H Photo
11 March 2015
  • Excerpt: Great fast action lens with good close up shots Good value for the money
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

worth the money

photo, B&H Photo
3 March 2015
  • Excerpt: Glad I finally got this lens. Take indoor sports photos. Was using Canon 70-200 F4. The 2.8 has made a big difference in the quality of my shots, even with my inexperience.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Amazing lens, amazing price

Paul Andrew Dunker, Adorama
22 February 2015
  • Excerpt: SUMMARYIn addition to this lens, I have owned the Nikon 80-200mm f2.8 ED, the Nikon 80-200mm f2.8 AF-s, the Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VR, and have used the Sigma f2.8 EX. This lens is on-par for sharpness with the Nikkor glass, and far better than the Sigma, which is a mess in terms of aberration and...
  • Pros: Consistent Output, Durable, Easily Interchangeable, Nice Bokeh, Rugged, Strong Construction
  • Cons: Heavy
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Pleasant.

aguirrealbertr, Ebay
15 February 2015
  • Summary: Bought this product to shoot indoor basketball games. Lens does a satisfactory job. Be prepared to use a monopod as this model does not have image stabilization. Pros are that the price is cheap. Cons - this camera is not a Canon!
  • Read full review
  • See Product at eBay ($769.00)
Overall 10
10

Five Stars

Fábio, Amazon
16 January 2015
Next page >>