www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Tamron-af75-300mm-f-4-5-6-ld.3205488
8.8 out of 10

Tamron AF75-300mm F/4-5.6 LD

This extended-range zoom offers true telephoto capability ideal Read more

Great Deal: $241.43

Reviews and Problems with Tamron AF75-300mm F/4-5.6 LD

Showing 1-10 of 500
Overall 10
10

Great lens

Photography student's husband, B&H Photo
2 weeks ago
  • Excerpt: got it shipped quick. very quiet. overall good lens for a good price.
  • Pros: Consistent Output, Easily Interchangeable, Fast / accurate auto-focus
  • Cons: Heavy
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Great lens at a great price!

Amy B, B&H Photo
2 weeks ago
  • Excerpt: I bought this lens to go with my new DSLR. I don't have a big budget, but I still need the ability to zoom in more than the kit lens will allow. This lens is great and it's now the one I use the most.
  • Pros: Consistent Output, Easily Interchangeable, Fast / accurate auto-focus
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Great Beginner Zoom Lens

Nordic Iron Photo, B&H Photo
2 weeks ago
  • Excerpt: I picked up this lens as a holdover until I can save for a higher quality lens. However, with this lens I'm not going to be in such a hurry. I put a couple hundred shots through the lens through the past week to test it and while it's not perfect it's certainly not a bad lens. I'd heard that the auto-zoom motor was loud. Yes, it might be considered loud, but only if you're really focusing on it.
  • Pros: Consistent Output, Easily Interchangeable, Fast / accurate auto-focus
  • Cons: Poor in Low Light
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Zoom works great

harrisonohio, B&H Photo
3 weeks ago
  • Excerpt: Bought for wildlife pics to go with the camera kit purchased last year. Definitely a beginner photographer but this lens helps immensely.
  • Pros: Consistent Output, Fast / accurate auto-focus
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Great Value

pastacats, B&H Photo
25 February 2015
  • Excerpt: I have a Nikon D40 and I'm just getting into wildlife photography. This lens has been easy to use and provides quality results. Compared to the equivalent Nikon lens, this one is much more affordable and has a longer warranty. Auto focus works well except it's a little off at very low light. There is a noticeable difference with VC on while hand-holding. Lens does have some weight to it, but nothing unmanageable. Overall I'm very pleased with my purchase.
  • Pros: Consistent Output, Easily Interchangeable, Fast / accurate auto-focus
  • Cons: Poor in Low Light
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Tamron 70-300

William H, Cameta
17 February 2015
  • Excerpt: Excellent product
  • Pros: Durable, Easily Interchangeable, Fast / accurate auto-focus, Lightweight, Strong Construction
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

camera shake when zoomed in.

shopgirl, Amazon
15 February 2015
  • Summary: not a great quality lens. It works, but it's no professional quality. Also you need a tripod when you zoom all the way because of camera shake.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Great lens for the money!

Medicman65, B&H Photo
12 February 2015
  • Excerpt: At this price, it's hard to go wrong. Takes some excellent shots. Some softness at full mag, so stop it down a bit for full 300mm use. The Macro mode is fantastic. Focus is pretty quick. Better than a lot of similarly priced zoom.
  • Pros: Easily Interchangeable, Fast / accurate auto-focus, Nice Bokeh
  • Cons: Poor in Low Light
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Can't beat the price!

ThecameraguyMartin, B&H Photo
11 February 2015
Overall 8
8.0

Nice lens – but it’s going back!

PajamaGuy "PJ", Amazon
6 February 2015
  • Summary: I have Canon’s T3i and 10-18, 18-55, 55-250, and 75-300 lenses. I understand that any of my body+lens combination will result in pic’s obtained with less than $1,000 worth of equipment – they will not be as sharp as those obtained with a $12,000 lens on a $6,000 body. Especially when I’m trying to shoot my granddaughter’s indoor basketball games. I rented the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens and compared it to my 55-250. That $50 rental saved me $700.
  • Read full review
Next page >>