Reviews and Problems with Tamron AF 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC LD Aspherical (IF) MACRO
Showing 1-10 of 500
This lens is fantastic
Dr. Jeff, Cameta
2 weeks ago
Excerpt: Having used both Nikon and third party lens for many years with my cameras, I was somewhat reluctant to buy anything but Nikon for my D7000. After listening to Cameta sales team and reading untold numbers of user reviews, I am fast becoming a fan of this lens.<br />Maybe I'm just lucky, but my 18-270 is fast, accurate, solid and just an excellent all-around lens. Even in low light, focus is fast and there is little to no searching to achieve crisp focus.
Pros: Easily Interchangeable, Excellent Vc, Fast / accurate auto-focus, Lightweight, Rugged
Summary: This lens is extremely versatile. There is no need to change lenses for close-ups or telephoto. I checked it our on numerous trips to San Diego animal parks and whale watching and it worked fine.
Summary: This lens meets or beats my best expectations. Nice photos with great detail to work with. Nice for up close and great for far away. I have a Sony A77 and has been no problems. I just wish they made a 100 - 500 mm version or something that reaches out a little farther. The only problem I've noticed is when I'm zooming in on something in the blue sky, the very corners of the image are a little darker then the center.
Excerpt: I'm an amateur photographer with a starter Nikon D3100 camera. I was going on the vacation of a life time to Alaska and I was told I would need a zoom lens. I looked at many in magazines and on line and I chose the Tamron 18-270mm because of price and reputation. This was the only lens I used on the entire trip. I could shoot dal sheep high up in the mountains and beautiful landscape shots of the Alaskan mountain range.
Pros: Durable, Easily Interchangeable, Fast / accurate auto-focus, Lightweight, Strong Construction
Summary: I love this lens. One lens is all I need now. Will ten different lens do a better job? Sure but 1) I don't want to carry ten lenses, 2) I am not a professional photographer. 3) I take photos to enjoy them, not sell them, and with this lens I take LOTS more photos rather then fumbling with a telephoto and then a 55mm, then a portrait, then a .... and guess what, half the time you will have the wrong lens on the camera.
Summary: The results I have gotten with this in the few weeks that I have had it are very satisfying. It also functions as an all in one lens when I am in the field photographing birds and other wild life as it interests me.
Summary: I have owned this lens for 3 years and have really gotten to know it well. Here is how it went; I got it and was so impressed with its 'all in one' ability, that it became my default lens (I purchased the Canon camera body w/o a lens, so it actually was my only/default lens). I even got used to it being quite heavy for my primary choice lens. About 7 months into having owned it, the automatic image focusing quit, and the general photo quality declined.
Summary: If you are looking for a "walk around" lens - or just a lens you can use for anything -- this is it!!! I am a lens snob - I usually only use my L lenses. But I bought this mostly out of curiosity...OMG - it out performs my Canon 24-105 L and is WAY LIGHTER!! Perhaps I just got a freaky good copy - but this lens is worth the try. I also have the Canon 18- 200 walk around lens and the Tamron is much much better and lighter.