www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Sigma APO 70-300mm F4-5.6 DG MACRO
8.1 out of 10

Sigma APO 70-300mm F4-5.6 DG MACRO

Sigma APO 70-300mm F4-5.6 DG MACRO The Sigma APO 70-300mm Read more

Great Deal: $169.00

Reviews and Problems with Sigma APO 70-300mm F4-5.6 DG MACRO

Showing 1-10 of 47
Overall 6
6.0

Recommended, but forwarned

Rev. Marshall Barth, Amazon
23 November 2014
  • Summary: Now that I've had this lens for awhile, I can write an objective review. All in all, it's a terrific lens and I bought it at a good price. Focus and clarity are excellent, producing so quality prints, even on the Macro settings. Two drawbacks to it though, are minor and can be lived with.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Least-Used Lens

T.Fen, Amazon
16 February 2014
  • Summary: Pros: Reasonably priced. Beautiful macro feature. The macro feature makes this lens. One of the macro photos taken with this is a centerpiece on the cover of one of my photo albums. Cons: This is, hands down, my least used lens. Without a tripod your full-zoom photos are very soft.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Consider how you will use this lens before you buy it.

Micheal Mathews, Amazon
10 October 2013
  • Summary: I've had this lens and used it pretty extensively for almost 4 months now. I bought it based on the overwhelmingly positive reviews which I've begun to feel are a bit misleading so even though this thing has almost 250 reviews I'm hoping to help out at least a few of you looking to buy.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

If you can't afford better, it could do

RRay, B&H Photo
11 June 2013
  • Excerpt: I was not overly impressed with this lens and I have liked Signa lenses in the past. The range of view was limited (with a full frame sensor) compared to Canon lenses I have used in the past. My biggest complaint was the macro settings. It was a pain to switch between regular and macro mode.
  • Pros: Easily Interchangeable, Lightweight, Strong Construction
  • Cons: Blurry Focus, Difficult To Set To Macro, Slow Focus
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Nice handy lens

Pradeep, Adorama
13 December 2012
  • Excerpt: It is a good lens that fit my budget. I put together a low end Canon SLR kit with a 50D and I felt this lens is more than sufficient for my photographic abilities. The lens is light weight, easy to attach and looks good on the camera. I tried a few macro shots and they came out really well.
  • Pros: Consistent Output, Easily Interchangeable, Lightweight, Nice Bokeh
  • Cons: Blurry Focus, Lens Creep, Poor in Low Light, Slow Focus, Weak Casing
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Does the job!

JD, B&H Photo
12 October 2011
  • Excerpt: Don't get me wrong the lens does what it's meant to do but it's just pretty lack lustre... It performs pretty bad in low light and just looks plain ugly. I made the mistake of purchasing this over the Pentax and I regret my decision. Included case is nice however.
  • Cons: Poor in Low Light
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

You have to use a Tripod to get sharp pictures.

Pankaj Sharma "Living e-life", Amazon
10 August 2010
  • Summary: Got the lens by looking at the great reviews. I have playing around with this one for around a month now. The pictures are good as long the light is great. The moment you take it in slightly low light, the images will have blur because camera shake will come into play as shutter speed goes down.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

good for a beginner

Drewheddleston, B&H Photo
31 July 2010
  • Excerpt: i just got this for my trip to the Serengeti and the Ngorongoro Crater in Tanzania. Got some great pictures of all kinds of animals with this lens. The focus, however, is pretty soft, and if you have the time when taking your shots you should switch to manual focus.
  • Pros: cheap
  • Cons: Blurry Focus, Heavy, Poor in Low Light, Slow Focus
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Great for the price

CG246, Amazon
21 June 2010
  • Summary: at $200US this is great for the price. i missed image stabalization but during the day with a fast aperture and shutter its not a deal breaker. I'd also sugget shooting with a mono/tripod for extra stability. The front of the barrel rotates on focus making polarized filters tricky to use.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

This is a cost-reduced version of the Sigma 70-300 DG OS lens

Timothy C Dotson, Amazon
21 May 2010
  • Summary: If shooting at the higher zoom levels, you need a tripod if you want it to be in focus. No bones about it, the aperture just isn't of an appropriate size to get enough light into the camera at 1/200 and 1/300 speeds in too many situations.
  • Read full review
Next page >>