www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Sigma-apo-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-macro.366465
8.2 out of 10

Sigma APO 70-300mm F4-5.6 DG MACRO

Sigma APO 70-300mm F4-5.6 DG MACRO The Sigma APO 70-300mm Read more

Great Deal: $144.00

Reviews and Problems with Sigma APO 70-300mm F4-5.6 DG MACRO

Showing 1-10 of 17
Overall 4
4.0

Good Price, NOT sharp, Macro feature is weak

Amazon
25 April 2012
  • Summary: I wanted to like this lens so badly because I own another Sigma lens (10-20mm wide angle) and I love it. Unfortunately this one fell short. I read all the reviews-good and bad-and decided to take a chance. Unfortunately the 'bad' reviews were dead on in my opinion. I purchased this lens over the Canon version specifically because of the macro feature.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Not Sharp, Poor AF

MJ, Adorama
12 December 2011
  • Excerpt: Got this for a secondary lens for my wife after a field mishap with her old one. Very poor performance. Slow focus soft images.<br />Not good for any kind of action. Would probably be ok for stationary shots.<br /><br />Ended up getting a Canon lens.
  • Pros: Easily Interchangeable, Lightweight
  • Cons: Blurry Focus, Lens Creep, Macro not sharp, Slow Focus
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

I wouldn't buy this

Alfie, B&H Photo
14 July 2011
  • Excerpt: I didn't get sharp pics with this lens. I sent mine back to get my money back.
  • Cons: Blurry Focus, Poor in Low Light, Slow Focus
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Over all I am OK with it.

Angie, B&H Photo
1 November 2010
  • Excerpt: Since this is new to me,I still need to try it,but not for indoor or night(for sure)
  • Cons: Blurry Focus, Heavy
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

No bargain!

Amazon Customer "Reitree", Amazon
15 December 2009
  • Summary: Well built, quick to focus, quiet but not quite what I expected. At full zoom, picture is washed out. With MACRO pictures, center of picture is out of focus while periphery is in focus.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Don't bother

Adorama
18 July 2007
  • Excerpt: Images are very soft at 300mm
  • Pros: Lightweight
  • Cons: Blurry Focus, Slow Focus, Undersharpened Images
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0
Value for money 8
8.0

User Review

THOMAS LUK, Photography Review
7 July 2006
  • Summary: For a cheap lense (compared to Nikon or Canon), we have to accept some scrifice. Relative speaking, it is a good outdoor lense since we always stop down to F 8 at least. Having used it mainly for my Canon EOS 10D in the last 2 years, I am quite happy with it. When I compared this lense with my friend's Canon 70-300 IS, at F11, the difference is quite small in case of sharpness.
  • Pros: Liight weight and feel quite sturdy
  • Cons: focus quite slow with low contrast subject and quite noisy when focusing
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

The product and image shown here do not match!

Debjit Biswas, amazon.in
9 July 2014
  • Summary: The display image has aperture ring and my decision to go for this product was largely motivated by this feature. However, the lens I received does not have the aperture ring at all. This is a big negative for all photography enthusiasts.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Updating my review

Graham, Amazon
22 April 2013
  • Summary: After singing the praises of tis lens in my last review - I feel that I must reflect and comment on the shoddy build quality. The lens gave great results for a month or so - then the auto-focus motor bearing failed - making it impossible to focus - even on manual. I contacted Sigma - they asked me to return it for a repair - I did and they repaired it.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Not sharp, terrible autofocus

Mark K. Cowan, Amazon
19 November 2012
  • Summary: On a D5100: The autofocus is slow and noisy. At a distance of around 20 metres in bright sunlight, I got sharper images by shooting at 70mm and cropping/enlarging, than by shooting at 300mm. I have the Sigma 150-500mm (which is an excellent lens) and assumed that the negative view of Sigma on the internet was due to Nikkor fanboys, but after trying this lens and the Sigma 17-70mm, I can agree with the negative stigma now.
  • Read full review
Next page >>