www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG MACRO HSM
8.4 out of 10

Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG MACRO HSM

The Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 II EX APO Macro HSM telephoto zoom lens Read more

Great Deal: $929.00

Reviews and Problems with Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG MACRO HSM

Showing 1-10 of 372
Overall 10
10

SIGMA VS CANON?!! It comes down to money and use..honeslty.

GANBATEKUDASAI, Amazon
27 May 2015
  • Summary: I am not a pro, just an avid enthusiast who loves Canon Cameras and products. I make NO MONEY on my photos, just like to take great photos of my family and friends. I was set on buying the Canon 70-200 2.8 IS II ($2100) then I seen this lens at my local camera rental store.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

I loved this lens it was my baby

C. Rogers, Amazon
28 April 2015
  • Summary: I loved this lens it was my baby. Sharp images. It did have fringing at the longer focal lengths. As loong as you aint shooting against white or anything close to white you should be good.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

the Canon is the better lens. But the question of whether it's $1

Thomas S Macioszek, Amazon
23 April 2015
  • Summary: I went the rental route before making a purchase on this lens. I rented this twice for two different weekends of photo testing, and I also rented the Canon version of this lens. Now, in my opinion, the Canon is the better lens.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

For non-Nikon/Canon lenses, Sigma is now my go-to

RachelCO "Rachel", Amazon
17 April 2015
  • Summary: LOVE THIS LENS!! My first non-prime lens was a Tamron wide angle zoom and the autofocus was just plain unusable. When I invested in this lens to get more compression in the backgrounds of my portraits, I was shocked at how awesome the autofocus is! Definintely the highlight.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

got it for the wrong purpose

Samantha Rose, Amazon
24 March 2015
  • Summary: this is definitely a macro lens. I tried to pull it off as a sports lens, but using rapid fire shutter on this wasn't the greatest. sigma makes great lenses - used it for some portraiture too, that worked a lot better than using it for sports.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Maximum Bang-to-Buck Ratio!

Spooner, Amazon
11 March 2015
  • Summary: If you are searching for a 70-200 2.8 lens, then you are serious about photography. You have done the homework, and you know that a 70-200 2.8 belongs in your camera bag. Now, the only question left is, do you pay $2000+ for a Nikon/Canon lens, or do you pocket $1000 in savings for a Sigma lens.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

product even better than expected

ag_oyama, Ebay
23 February 2015
Overall 10
10

its a very good buy if you cant afford the original canon/nikon

dalmar bentley, Amazon
2 December 2014
  • Summary: its a very good buy if you cant afford the original canon/nikon. i bought it and no problem at all
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

8 it is working out great..

terry, Amazon
6 November 2014
  • Summary: This is the 4th Sigma lens that I have bought and the fastest at being 2.8 it is working out great...I am very impressed...
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Fast glass, great price,

Joshua D. Meadows, Amazon
14 October 2014
  • Summary: The autofocus is plenty fast and the lens is sharp. The controls are smooth and it just feels good in my hand. The Optical Stabilazation is very good. I have used this lens repeatedly carrying it only in hand, and my images came out very sharp.
  • Read full review
Next page >>