www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Sigma APO 50-500mm F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM
9.3 out of 10

Sigma APO 50-500mm F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM

Sigma APO 50-500mm F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM The Sigma APO 50-500 Read more

Great Deal: $1,509.00

Reviews and Problems with Sigma APO 50-500mm F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM

Showing 1-6 of 6

Expert Review

pentaxforums.com
16 August 2011
  • Summary: We are happy to see that Sigma's second version of the 50-500mm introduced HSM in the Pentax mount and lowered the minimum focusing distance.
  • Read Full Review
Overall 9
8.7
Design 9
9.0
Value for money 9
9.0
Features 10
9.5
Performance 8
8.0
Picture quality 8
8.0

Sigma APO 50-500mm f/4.5-6.3 EX DG OS HSM

What Digital Camera
29 January 2011
  • Excerpt: An impressive 10x zoom range for just over £1100, but has Sigma been a little over-ambitious with this superzoom optic?
  • Read Full Review

Lens Test: Sigma 50-500mm F/4.5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM

Pop Photo
18 July 2010
  • Excerpt: The first version of this lens earned the nickname Bigma for its 4.25-pound heft and huge size.Now comes Son of Bigma ($1,600, street), lighter at a little less than 4.2
  • Read Full Review

50-500 mm f/4.5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM

LensTip.com
17 May 2010
  • Conclusion: The Sigma 50–500 mm f/4.5–6.3 APO DG OS HSM model supplemented the offer of that Japanese producer very nicely.
  • Cons: f/6.3 fastness already near 220 mm focal length,, image quality at the maximum aperture for 400-500 mm focal lengths range could have been better,, weak image quality ...
  • Read Full Review

Sigma APO 50-500mm F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM

scroll.com.tr
28 June 2012
  • Excerpt: Sigma’nın değişken odak aralıklı tele objektifi APO 50-500mm F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM, kuş gözlemcileri, astro fotoğrafçılar ve manzara fotoğrafçıları için oldukça kullanışlı
  • Read Full Review Translate to English

Expert Review

Optyczne.pl
13 May 2010
  • Summary: Na koniec można zastanowić się nad jeszcze jedną rzeczą. Mamy teraz wyraźnie tańszy i słabszy optycznie model 150–500 mm OS oraz droższy i lepszy 50–500 mm OS.
  • Pros: solidne wykonanie,, dobra lub bardzo dobra jakość obrazu w centrum kadru i to praktycznie dla całego zakresu ogniskowych,, dobra jakość obrazu na brzegu kadru dla zakr...
  • Cons: jasność f/6.3 już od okolic ogniskowej 220 mm,, jakość obrazu na maksymalnym otworze dla ogniskowych 400–500 mm mogłaby być lepsza,, słaba jakość obrazu na brzegu kadr...
  • Read Full Review Translate to English