www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG Macro HSM II
8.6 out of 10

Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG Macro HSM II

The Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 II EX APO Macro HSM telephoto zoom lens Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG Macro HSM II

Showing 1-10 of 145
Overall 10
10

SIGMA VS CANON?!! It comes down to money and use..honeslty.

GANBATEKUDASAI, Amazon
27 May 2015
  • Summary: I am not a pro, just an avid enthusiast who loves Canon Cameras and products. I make NO MONEY on my photos, just like to take great photos of my family and friends. I was set on buying the Canon 70-200 2.8 IS II ($2100) then I seen this lens at my local camera rental store.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

the Canon is the better lens. But the question of whether it's $1

Thomas S Macioszek, Amazon
23 April 2015
  • Summary: I went the rental route before making a purchase on this lens. I rented this twice for two different weekends of photo testing, and I also rented the Canon version of this lens. Now, in my opinion, the Canon is the better lens.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

A no-brainer if you need OS, fast AF and f/2.8 for use with Sony A/E/FE mount

NEXuser, Amazon
8 February 2015
  • Summary: I sold my Sony 70-200mm f/2.8 G SSM to get the Sigma, wanting the lens-based OS feature with my NEX-6 (w/ LA-EA2 adaptor) but fully expecting a slight downgrade in image quality. Well, I am pleasantly surprised and very much impressed with the overall performance of my copy of this lens.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Not Tack Sharp

LKP, Amazon
2 February 2015
  • Summary: The bokeh is beautiful, but it simply is not THAT sharp. I photograph in low light a lot and I find myself never going below F4 because I don't feel like it's sharp enough.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

The build quality seems to be very good although the lens is not metal like the Canon

Starkteam, Amazon
27 August 2014
  • Summary: This lens was highly rated against the Canon equivalent at half the price. The only complaint was that it was not as rugged as the Canon. I am not a professional and do not subject my equipment to some of the rigors of a working photographer so I don't worry about this.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

As a professional photographer I have got to say that this lens is amazing! Beautifully sharp

Frank N., Amazon
27 August 2014
  • Summary: This is my go-to lens! As a professional photographer I have got to say that this lens is amazing! Beautifully sharp, great bokeh, and well built. I highly recommend this lens.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

bought my first DSLR ( nikon d3100 ) used and liked the camera but not the kit lens two yrs ...

tim sears, Amazon
11 August 2014
  • Summary: kinda new at photography had a 35mm when kids where growing up,bought my first DSLR ( nikon d3100 ) used and liked the camera but not the kit lens two yrs ago, upgraded to the Nikon d7100 two months ago and needed better glass for a better camera..
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Great lens....

Owen E. Heuston, Amazon
23 July 2014
  • Summary: I originally used this lens with my Nikon D300 but it really came into its own when used with my D800. The Sigma VR works well and allows me to shoot hand held at lower shutter speeds without having to use a tripod or monopod. The bokeh is pleasing and the lens has a fast and quiet AF.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

I love the sharpness

Ms. Maureen B. Spagnolo "moskin", Amazon
13 July 2014
  • Summary: I've recently bought this lens, and used it twice. I love the sharpness, and fast focus on the lens. I have several other Sigma lenses and have been pleased with them all. My only reason for not giving this lens 5 stars is because of the crappy tripod collar that came with the lens.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Four Stars

Christina G., Amazon
1 July 2014
Next page >>