www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Sigma-70-200mm-f2-8-ex-dg-macro-hsm-ii.32908873
8.5 out of 10

Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG Macro HSM II

The Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 II EX APO Macro HSM telephoto zoom lens Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG Macro HSM II

Showing 1-10 of 115
Overall 8
8.0

I love the sharpness

Ms. Maureen B. Spagnolo "moskin", Amazon
13 July 2014
  • Summary: I've recently bought this lens, and used it twice. I love the sharpness, and fast focus on the lens. I have several other Sigma lenses and have been pleased with them all. My only reason for not giving this lens 5 stars is because of the crappy tripod collar that came with the lens. Upon removing the tripod collar, the very weak hinge pin broke. Why put such a shabby (albeit very necessary) accessory on such a fine lens? I'm disappointed in Sigma.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Four Stars

Christina G., Amazon
1 July 2014
Overall 2
2.0

Bought "Like New", autofocus did not function (connected to Sony SLT A33).

Adam Satisky, Amazon
26 June 2014
  • Summary: This was going to be my first enthusiast/pro lens, and after reading all the great reviews I was pretty excited to try it out. Unfortunately, I was let down - the autofocus did not function. When I pressed the shutter halfway down, I could hear a very faint high pitch noise, but the focus gage did not move and the camera display did not come into focus. Tried multiple times (turned on/off switches, took lens on/off, changed focus modes, etc.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Returned

J Benjamin, Amazon
11 June 2014
  • Summary: Upon receipt of this lens I noticed it was heavy and very well built. I connected it to my Sony a77 camera and started taking pictures. Immediately I noticed it focused slowly and was not accurate. When I set my camera for spot focus and aimed at a subject, it would focus and give me the double beep sound confirming the subject was in focus; however, it was not in focus at all. I did this several times with different subjects and got the same result.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

You must at least consider this lens

NWI wedding photographer, Amazon
23 February 2014
  • Summary: I have been shooting with all Sony cameras for the past 3 years and I now own both an A99 and a used A77. I have a fairly well known photo and video business as well as a well paying regular job. Why is my income important to this review? Because I can afford the Sony G version of this lens, but have chosen the Sigma. I just cannot justify the additional $1000 for the Sony G. If it was made by CZ I might consider it, but it would also probably be a bit sharper as well.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Great lens for the price.

keithmac48, Ebay
21 February 2014
  • Summary: I love this lens, quick focus and great image quality. I would recommend to anyone.Does not auto focus with TC's but is very easy to manually focus. Great for sports photography in low light.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

excellent pro lens

tnt_sweeney, Ebay
19 February 2014
  • Summary: Wonderful lens. Very sharp for the price. Good starter pro lens without spending the high price of a Nikon lens. It is a heavy lens, but you should expect that from any brand of this caliber. I like the weight, makes it feel better in my hands. Would highly recommend it to anyone.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Great lens for sports and low light

Jeff®, Amazon
10 December 2013
  • Summary: This is my #1 guy. I bought this for my son's sports. I needed a fast lens so that I could use fast shutter speeds, and I can get 1/1000 or faster easily for his Little League baseball games. I'm not kidding, you can count the stitches on a ball after it's batted with the speeds and sharpness this lens provides. It worked well for his football games and now I'm getting used to what I can do indoors for basketball.
  • Read full review

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 II EX DG Macro HSM APO review by m-ex

m-ex, slrgear.com
15 October 2013
  • Summary: Used on D90, D600. If on D90 i couldn't fix front or backfocus issue, so on D600 i do. But the main problem i got spotted, that @ 70mm i got 100% front focus, and after 135 to 200mm i got slight back focus. So i can't rely on adjustments in camera. All in all if AF in lens was hitting the target right, than it was surprisingly sharp image until 135mm.
  • Pros: Zoom, 2.8, price
  • Cons: Heavy, poor AF, soft from 135-200, back/front focus.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Great lens for the price

JayDreamer, Amazon
15 July 2013
  • Summary: I cannot afford an OEM 70-200 f2.8. Almost all Canon / Nikon / Sony ones comes in the $2000 + price tag. This is a great replacement for budget oriented people like me. I have experience shooting with the 70-200 f2.8 L glass from Canon. While Sigma may not be a 100% equivalent, I am sure it can do almost everything up to 95%+ accuracy like AF, OS etc, and IQ almost as good. For almost half the price, it is a great buy and great deal.
  • Read full review
Next page >>