www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Dummy.190587
7.6 out of 10

Sigma 55-200mm F4-5.6 DC /HSM

Sigma 55 - 200MM Lens for Nikon SLR Camera 684-306 - This compac Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Sigma 55-200mm F4-5.6 DC /HSM

Showing 1-10 of 100
Overall 10
10

Five Stars

Tennis Z. Hatfield, Amazon
6 July 2014
Overall 10
10

Just what I was looking for!

kimber7776, Ebay
3 January 2014
  • Summary: New to the camera world, but I love this lens! It's exactly as it was described, and it was a great value!
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

A very good lens for it price!

theamadofoundation, Ebay
2 May 2012
  • Summary: The flexibility of this lens it´s great. The autofocus it´s a little bit slow, specially if you are taking moving objects, but overall, it´s a great bargain! Pics are not incredible sharp but highly acceptable. In general, Sigma lenses are very good!
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Sigma 55-200mm DC Lens

ny1jet, Ebay
19 January 2010
  • Summary: This is a really well built lens. I found it took great, clear pictures outside. On the down side, it is not for indoor use. To slow, but with this Ap most would be. Again, a great lens for a great price, your next step above this would be to get a IS / OS model with image stabilization, if you can afford it, I would do that
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Sigma Zoom

and315, Ebay
14 January 2010
  • Summary: I needed a replacement lens for my 28 - 70mm Sigma Even though this lens only offered f4.0 its still a very nice lens. my other lens was too soft and the pictures were blurry unless i used f8 and above. I am glad i got this lens.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Cheep Lens

Laureen E. Chaffin, Amazon
17 November 2009
  • Summary: Received the lens and it has a flaw on it. Could not get it replaced. Guess you get what you paid for, I would say spend a little extra money and get a good lens.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Good build, adequte focus, sharp enough pics

M. Seither "The glider", Amazon
9 July 2009
  • Summary: This lens has a nice quality feel to it. Real focus ring. Metal mount. Designed and focused for newer digital cameras. I got it for what I consider to be a great price. I have a used 20d and it compliments the camera nicely and takes very good pictures. I post process a bit to give them more punch in certain circumstances but all in all a very nice lens that focuses fast enough for most amateurs.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0
Value for money 10
10

User Review

Franglais, Photography Review
4 June 2009
  • Summary: This is a review of the 2009 version of this lens in Nikon mount version with the HSM auto-focusing. This means it’s compatible with low-end Nikons like the D40/D40x/D60/D5000 I bought the 55-200 to stand in temporarily when my Nikon 18-200 VR developed a fault while on holiday. I’m rather impressed with it and I’ve decided to keep on using it.
  • Pros: - Cost, - Size and weight, - Image quality, - Speed (and silence) of autofocus, - Maximum aperture, - Efficient lens hood
  • Cons: Difficult to attach and detach the lens hood without turning the focus barrel which makes a grating sound, The zoom barrel is at the back of the lens instead of being at the front as on the Nikon lenses. It takes a little while to get used to it, No possibility of retouching the focus manually as you can on the (much more expensive) Nikon lenses
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Good bang for the buck!

ocsurfer, Ebay
29 March 2009
  • Summary: The lens works excellent on the Sigma SD14. Produces very sharp, contrasty images with good color reproduction. This lens is a sleeper lens for any camera! The build quality is obviously consumer grade, but not a toy either. But the IQ(image quality) is where it really shines! It is quite sharp throughout the zoom even wide open. Color reproduction and contrast is darn good as well. Focusing is quick and pretty darn quiet too!
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

excellent quality for the price. if i get 2 years it'll be worth it.

aidan, Amazon
16 January 2009
  • Summary: i used to shoot in my teens and 20's, avidly in 35mm. did'nt really do any photography seriously for several years then decided to get a digi 5 yrs ago. learned a little about digital processes then 3 years ago got a dslr. i shoot with H type small sensor camera, 1.6 ratio, though at some point i will move to a C size camera, maybe canon 50D, but for now i'll keep checking the reviews. digital photography is still relatively new, (10yrs), as compared to film.
  • Read full review
Next page >>