www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Sigma-18-200mm-f3-5-6-3-dc-os-hsm.34348004
7.7 out of 10

Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM

Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC OS /HSM is designed for use with digi Read more

Great Deal: $398.92

Reviews and Problems with Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM

Showing 1-10 of 22
Overall 4
4.0

Suffers from a lack of sharpness

Amazon
13 March 2014
  • Summary: As a landscape photographer, sharpness is irreplaceable. I am always on the look-out for a light lens that suits my backpacking and hiking needs - and this lens is not it! Realistically, I knew this lens would not perform like a prime lens or $1500 zoom lens. However, it is incredibly soft and that is a deal breaker for me. In comparing with my Nikon 16-85 and 70-300 on my Nikon D7100, images were notably softer across all focal lengths.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Issue with lense

Gobesh, Amazon
23 July 2013
  • Summary: once i recive the prodect, it was good, but later star using it, it got stucked up on 50mm, not coming back to normal at all, given to service in local shop, not satisfied with the product...
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Disappointed in Sigma and the lens

Jennie, Amazon
27 December 2010
  • Summary: I bought this lens for my Nikon SLR and was very disappointed. The lens did not fit the camera correctly (I would get f-- for the f-stop) so no picture could be taken. I called Sigma and they said the only way to fix it was to ship the lens back to Sigma. They did not find anything wrong with the lens so they asked me to ship my camera to them to calibrate the camera to the lens. I was not happy because 1. shouldn't it already be calibrated if it is for a Nikon camera 2.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Good looking, not a performer

D. Braden "dbfour", Amazon
30 May 2010
  • Summary: I'm not sure if the lens that I got was just defective or representative of the product as a whole. I will say that this lens is in the process of being returned and replaced with another brand. It was nice to think that one lens would answer all of my needs but there is a reason to go with a DSLR and that is the ability to change lenses for varying circumstances.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

OS jitters very bad

Peter G, Amazon
12 May 2010
  • Summary: I purchased this as a lower cost alternative to the Sigma 18-250 for use on my Canon Xsi. Construction quality and optics seemed to be fine. The optical stabilization was something else completely. At anywhere past 1/2 zoom to full zoom, the OS caused the image in the viewfinder to jump very noticeably. I was using the lens for a lot of sports photography, so the zoom was very important. The jitters of the image at mid to high zoom were so bad I could not use the lens.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Lens faults

Wilburt Hanisco, Amazon
15 October 2009
  • Summary: I purchased this lens to attach to a Nikon D-60 SLR camera. It was to be used in my many excursions with a travel/exchange group. This year we went to Turkey. At first I was satisfied with the lens but it commenced to give me camera errors that read sort of," Lens not fully attached to camera". To correct I locked the lens and tightened. This happened approximately 15-20 times in an eighteen day period. Also, the lens developed numerous spots.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Great lens... for the short time it lasted

CKR "MamaRhino08", Amazon
23 August 2009
  • Summary: Loved this lens when it worked... however now, only one year later, this lens doesn't work! Short circuits new Nikon D90 camera and won't AF on D50. I can't afford to be buying a new $500 lens on a yearly basis - I'm extremely disappointed in Sigma's longevity.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Not very good quality image

L. Siddiqui "Labonya. S", Amazon
11 August 2013
  • Summary: After my Sigma broke, I got a Tamron version with similar specs but at cheaper price and for better value. In all honesty, the 18-200mm has an issue of introducing noise, and the locking mechanism is very rigid so you are likely to get it jammed. The barrel often requires a small nudge to get it to move. If I had to rate this product in comparison to the better value Tamron version, I would rate 4/10.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Not very happy

Humble Guy, Amazon
11 May 2011
  • Summary: the images for tall structures, like historical clock towers or chapels seems to be titled (very slightly) like a fish eye lense
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

not really what expected

O. Wouters, Amazon
5 April 2010
  • Summary: I thought that the other lenses that weren't Canon were of the same quality. Talked to many fotographers and all agreed. But NOT!! I get a much sharper picture with my original canon that with this Sigma lens. So... I am still using my old one and only when I have to zoom in far away I use the sigma. Bummer!
  • Read full review
Next page >>