Reviews and Problems with Sigma 18-200mm F3,5-6,3 DC OS / HSM
Showing 1-10 of 127
Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM review by mannypr
6 November 2010
Summary: This is a nice lens . It's very sharp from 18mm-75mm with very low distortion. From 75 it is a bit soft at the corners but still sharp in center . at about 100mm it's soft again getting sharp by 135mm and at 200mm it's quite good for an inexpensive lens.
Pros: Built , overall good sharpness , effective OS
Cons: Inconsistence in sharpness , prone to veiling flare , heavy
Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM review by koolou
6 May 2010
Summary: I have never had a Sigma lens before for any of my previous DSLR's but decided to purchase this Sigma 18-200 for it's large zoom (11.1X) and also its large filter size(72mm) Having optical stabilization was another factor in my buying this lens.
Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM review by steve_h
27 May 2008
Summary: I had a non OS Sigma 18-200 and it was a nice little walk around lens. Took very nice shots with my Canon XTi. I upgraded to the OS version to get the OS function. It seems to work well â€“ probably provides me with 2-3 stops performance and saves a lot of shots for me in less than bright light.
Pros: OS, wide range zoom, low cost, small size, good build
Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM review by spuelijah
7 May 2008
Summary: This is my fourth Sigma lens. I also own a 30mm f/1.4 and the 10-20mm, but I sold a 150mm f/2.8 macro. I've had three Nikons as well, but they've all been sold. Although this one is not an EX lens like the others, the quality is nearly as good.
Pros: nice finish & build, 72mm thread
Cons: auto-focus hunts in low light & makes a buzz sound, f/6.3
Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM review by zoomfreak
8 December 2007
Summary: bought this to try to replace my travel lens the EF-S17-85IS , but this is a horrible lens. I kept my Canon Ef-S17-85IS as my travel and day light lens. I have EF-S17-55f2.8IS for my work and serious shooting so this lens has no place in my kit.
Pros: build quality (that is good)
Cons: horrible color , horribe resolution , pronounced CA, pronounced distortion
Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM review by touristguy87
22 August 2007
Summary: Ok this is attempt #6 to write a review of this lens. Maybe shorter=better. First, I have to say that I have gotten a lot of good shots from this lens on a 400d and a 30d, at F8, using DxO. Even at F6.3 shooting 200mm handheld at night, it has surprised me.
Pros: zoom range, price, weight, size all good
Cons: not an "L" lens :) I'd recommend this lens MAYBE depending on what you want it for
Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM review by EF-S10-22
31 July 2007
Summary: I sold it , it is slow(AF speed) and heavy . I think I was one of these first people to order this and have had it lonest since I was in OSaka when I bought it . I got it on June 1. Initially linked it , excited about it like the previous guy.
Pros: range, OS.
Cons: Horrible color rendition, soft coner throughout the range, AF problems
Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM review by katzer
30 July 2007
Summary: There are macro lenses for macro photography There are ultra wide lenses for landscape photography. There a portrait lenses. There are fisheye lenses. Each lens has a specific usage. This lens is intended for times when you can take only one lens.