Reviews and Problems with Sigma 18-125mm F3.8-5.6 DC OS HSM
Showing 1-10 of 76
Well worth it.
8 July 2012
Summary: This was just what I was hoping for. I had read pros and cons from others, but I read a review from a canon user mag that rated it a best buy for mid range zooms. I am very pleased with the performance so far. The motor for the auto focus sometimes is busy, but it is not a deal breaker.
J. Murdock "Web editor, wedding photographer", Amazon
9 September 2009
Summary: Not willing to spend $600 for the Canon 18-200 IS, but distrustful of the Sigma/Tamron 18-200s that have a max aperture of 6.3 at the tele end, I found that what I really wanted was something like the ol' 28-200 I used to carry on my film cameras.
Summary: After using the 18-55mm lens that came with my DSLR for nearly a year I get fed up with not being able zoom in to a subject if they were too far away. So I researched for a couple of weeks on which was the best lens to get. It was between this and the Nikon 18-105, so I went for this.
Summary: Very good lens - bought this to compliment other lenses. After buying both Nikon and Sigma lenses, there is no difference at all between the two labels, with Sigma retailing at a fraction of the cost.