www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Sigma-17-70mm-f2-8-4-dc-macro-os-hsm.12282834
9.0 out of 10

Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM

The 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro HSM OS is the first lens in the Cont Read more

Great Deal: $419.00

Reviews and Problems with Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM

Showing 1-10 of 36
Overall 4
4.0

Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM le

Dr. Moto, B&H Photo
27 August 2014
  • Excerpt: I tested the lens and had a problem with focusing. The problem possibly could have been rsolved with the USB dock which I didn't have so I sent the lens back. Two stars for build quality and size.
  • Pros: Lightweight, Strong Construction
  • Cons: Blurry Focus
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Don't bother buying this for a K-5

Xtina, Amazon
11 August 2014
  • Summary: Totally unimpressed. I bought this for my K-5 and it is worse than my $200 dollar kit lens. I bought this because I wanted an upgrade from my 18-50mm kit, but boy was this the wrong choice: Higher than average noise levels in night photography Blurry images at 17-20mm Distortion at the edge of the frame in wide angle shots Unable to autofocus/incorrect focusing at 17-20mm Bleh. The only thing I will say that it is good about this lens is the Macro.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

dissapointed

marcm, B&H Photo
19 February 2014
  • Excerpt: I don't know why, but I had a different experience than most others here with the sigma 17-70 contemporary. First I tested it for sharpness against my 18-55 WR kit lens by shooting a test sheet/chart with each lens (using a K-30). The sigma contemporary was sharper, noticeably sharper, but not by leaps and bounds. I then shot photos around the neighborhood, the same scenes with both lenses. I was surprised to see that the kit lens was consistently sharper than the sigma!
  • Pros: Fast / accurate auto-focus
  • Cons: Heavy
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Unreliable AF motor function for SONY

J. Tran "JenX.Tran", Amazon
19 January 2012
  • Summary: Well, I just got this lens in the mail "Brand New" for my Sony a77. Immediately I decided to put it to the test. I have to say that image quality was good when images were in focus. Initially I tested the lens indoors. I ran the test against my Sony 16-50mm f/2.8. To be fair to both lenses, I ran the test of both lenses at f/4.0 since the Sigma lens has an f range of 2.8-4.0. Now, I was disappointed to note that the f/2.8 only lasts up to 18mm, then it goes to f/3.2.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Terrible Auto focus!!

Amazon Customer, Amazon
27 April 2011
  • Summary: I really wanted to like this lens. On paper, it looks like a near perfect everyday lens. The relatively fast aperture, nice wide to medium zoom range, and bonus close focus distance make it sound like something you could keep on your camera most of the time. Unfortunately, Sigma still hasn't figured out the auto focus system of the Canon EOS lineup. I immediately noticed a severe front focusing problem in the first set of test shots taken when the lens arrived.
  • Read full review
Overall 3
3.0

User Review

dhphoto, Fredmiranda
6 April 2011
  • Conclusion: I wanted to love this and use it as a general purpose lens, but it's VERY soft, much heavier than it's non-OS predecessor and expensive for what it is. Maybe I got a bad one (which seems to happen a bit too much to me with Sigma lenses). Steer clear.
  • Pros: Reasonably well built.
  • Cons: Everything else. Soft, heavy, expensive for what it is
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Just Ok if you get a good copy.

Mathew, Amazon
6 October 2014
  • Summary: I have had this lens for more than 6 months now and I am slightly frustrated with it. Initially it was fine though focus was off out of the box. I then calibrated it using the Sigma USB dock and have managed to get it to focus almost accurately though it wasn't always perfect. After 5 months of use I spotted fungus marks on the front element which was surprising for a new lens. I sent it to Sigma for repair and even they were surprised to see fungus.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

It is quite soft at 17mm and oddly stopping down the aperture does not make things noticeably better. The good thing is that it

CraigM "craig13393", Amazon
11 July 2014
  • Summary: My conclusion on this lens is that all the reviews are right. It is quite soft at 17mm and oddly stopping down the aperture does not make things noticeably better. The good thing is that it is still a lot better than a Pentax 18-55 kit lens so can be seen as a genuine step-up lens, but at £329 it should be! The zoom range is also good and at anything from about 30mm upwards this lens is extremely sharp, especially from f5.6.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Poor

kenc, Amazon
5 February 2014
  • Summary: This was not as good as I had expected, or was used to, as it does not work prperley in automatic mode
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Very soft

Mrs Elzbieta Wilkes, Amazon
4 May 2012
  • Summary: Purchased as a replacement for my ageing 17-85mm Canon which had a contact fault. However, in tests the sigma was very soft in comparison. Focus accuracy was poor too. So returned it and had the Canon repaired instead.
  • Read full review
Next page >>