Reviews and Problems with Sigma 12-24mm F4.5-5.6 EX DG ASPHERICAL /HSM
Showing 1-3 of 3
Lens for aerial video
E. K. Wlin, Amazon
20 August 2012
Summary: I ordered one of this despite that I know Sigma QA problem. This is just a deal I can't pass. I have a Canon 16-35L but at 16mm, the distortion was not acceptable for video. I studied the distortion chart carefully and at 17mm this lens is as good as my 16-35L at 21mm which both have little...
Conclusion: Agai, lack of Sigma's QC: i bought one second hand, but this lens is a lemon, you can throw it away. The lens was soft overall no matter what i used, really bad till f7.1, from f8 till f22 was overall soft.
Cons: lack of Sigma's QC, lens is soft overall, slow AF
fotographer "It is not soft, it is hyperfocal", Amazon
6 May 2009
Summary: This is my story of Sigma 12-24 lens for Canon. How come I always end up shooting on the wide or long end of my 28-70 zoom? I also wanted to go wider than my Canon EF 20mm f/2.8 USM Wide Angle Lens for Canon SLR Cameras .