www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Sigma 10-20mm F3.5 EX DC HSM
8.9 out of 10

Sigma 10-20mm F3.5 EX DC HSM

f3.5 aperture throughout the entire zoom range and is perfect fo Read more

Great Deal: $449.00

Reviews and Problems with Sigma 10-20mm F3.5 EX DC HSM

Showing 1-10 of 19
Overall 2
2.0

It failed on arrival, nothing but dark photos, sent back

Deb, B&H Photo
2 weeks ago
  • Excerpt: I can not really rate this lens as I had it only for three days and sent it back for replacement. When my new lens arrives in two days (replacement at B & H is outstanding, with perfect RME paperwork and attitude by employees), I will be able to rate this lens.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Not worth the money - It does not work

DonnaMac, B&H Photo
4 August 2013
  • Excerpt: I had the Sigma 10-20 F/4 - 5.6 and with limited use and it suddenly would not longer focus. I sent it off to be repaired and it still does not work after $172.00 worth of repairs. It worked right out of the box and when I went to use it on a shoot it would not focus.
  • Cons: Would not focus
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Defected lense. AF is not accurate!!!

vic79, Adorama
23 April 2013
  • Excerpt: Rerturned
  • Pros: Strong Construction
  • Cons: Heavy, Poor in Low Light
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

User Review

vic79, Adorama
23 April 2013
Overall 2
2.0

Sharpness and focus problems

Russ, Amazon
28 January 2010
  • Summary: I bought this lens based on a Popular Photography test and a recent Sigma purchase. I'm very satisfied with the 50~150mm, but I returned this lens. I wanted to like it, but I continued to have focus problems and unsharp images.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Mine has a focus problem.

R. Lodge, Amazon
24 November 2009
  • Summary: Maybe I just got a lemon. I worked with this lens for the first time today and I noticed that it is focused at infinity when the outer scale reads 3 ft. And when I turn the focus ring to the infinity mark - at the line, the focus starts to go out. Going beyond this mark it goes further out of focus.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

User Review

Bonjon, Adorama
6 August 2008
  • Excerpt: I have only read good things about this lens so I wasn't hesitant about buying it, especially considering it was half the price of the Nikon 12-24mm. However, I was so unimpressed that I returned it. Now maybe I got a 'bad one' but it did not take sharp photos at all.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Worse lens I've ever bought

TimPix, WEX
13 February 2013
  • Summary: This was always cited as being a better lens than its slower f4-5.6 sibling and with a correspondingly higher price tag, so it should.Therefore with much eagerness to get some true ultrawide-angle 'punch' into my D7000 photos, I was so disappointed when anything taken wider than f6.3 just looks...
  • Cons: Blurry Focus
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Worst Lens I've Ever Bought

Tim Kidner "Hucklebrook Hound", Amazon
23 December 2010
  • Summary: This was always cited as being a better lens than its slower f4-5.6 sibling and with a correspondingly higher price tag, so it should. Therefore with much eagerness to get some true ultrawide-angle 'punch' into my D7000 photos, I was so disappointed when anything taken wider than f6.3 just looks...
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

problems with focus

Luís Branquinho, Amazon
23 December 2010
  • Summary: Had to send the lens back. Had problems with focus, I never got to the point I wanted to focus, focused always a cm or meters ahead. I was really disappointed.
  • Read full review
Next page >>