www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Pentax-smc-fa-645-400mm-f-5-6-ed-if-af.33264598
8.9 out of 10

Pentax SMC FA 645 400mm f/5.6 ED [IF] AF

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Pentax SMC FA 645 400mm f/5.6 ED [IF] AF

Showing 1-9 of 9
Overall 9
9.0

User Review

Kameko, pentaxforums.com
18 June 2014
  • Excerpt: I already own the DA* 60-250 and found that I wasn't getting the reach needed to capture birds in flight as well as other wildlife. I found this lens by chance on my local craigslist. At the price paid, I couldn't argue. AF is a bit tricky and can easily be engaged by accident - not something I find desirable as I only shoot manual. Wide open at f/5.6 is very sharp in my opinion and only mildly noticeably sharper stopped down.
  • Pros: size, weight, sharpness
  • Cons: slow aperture
  • Read full review
Overall 9
9.0

User Review

goubejp, pentaxforums.com
1 January 2014
  • Excerpt: As I already owned a FA*600, and a DA*300 I bought this lens for a dedicated mission : an hand-holdable, lightweight lens for travel, birds in flight, and tricky approach of birds, with more reach than the DA*300 and better than a DA300 + a converter. It met 90 % of my expectations. The lens is a compact as my DA*300. It largely outperforms the DA*300 with a sigma teleconverter. Stopped down to F8, it is sharp, sharp enough to produce moiré on the birds feathers.
  • Pros: Sharpness stopped down, light and compact
  • Cons: CA, autofocus hunts sometimes, price on second hand market
  • Read full review
Overall 9
9.0

User Review

StigVidar, pentaxforums.com
16 April 2013
  • Excerpt: As a 400mm lens, this is small and hand hold able. It is about the same size as DA*300/4. Image quality is excellent, but DA*300/4 is still a little bit sharper at f/5.6 and if you crop the image from DA*300/4 to the same size as from FA*400, it is difficult to see any difference. But if FA*400 is stopped down it will resolve more detail than the 300mm lens. Autofocus is fast, but I never could get it to work properly on any K-5 I tried it on.
  • Pros: Small
  • Cons: A little slow at f/5.6
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

User Review

Thomas, pentaxforums.com
1 March 2013
  • Excerpt: The lens is quite light and very sharp when used at high shutter speeds or very secure tripod mount at lower speeds. It doesn't have the build quality of * lens, but the optical quality is in the same league. I find the AF reasonably fast (but I was using manual focus lenses before the 645D so my perspective may be different) more importantly,I find the AF very accurate.
  • Pros: sharp, light, not expensive
  • Cons: not f/4, but then it wouldn't be light
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

User Review

alkassim, pentaxforums.com
5 November 2011
  • Excerpt: very light and sharp lens, i hiked with 645d, very good sharp birds photos (only test) . however it is extremely slow compared to new nikon and canon counterparts.
  • Pros: light sharp and not very expensive.
  • Cons: CA in high contrast, S L O W .. coming from nikon.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

User Review

rlj, pentaxforums.com
8 August 2011
  • Excerpt: This lens is very sharp and relatively light weight for its length. It is about as long of a lens for the 645D as I'd typically travel with (the length starts chewing up limited storage space in a backpack). With that in mind, I think a nice telephoto travel set with the 400/5.6 is the 75/2.8, the 120 FA macro and the 200 FA. (If weight/size needs to be kept to a minimum, then I'd go with the 75/2.8, the 150 FA and 300/5.6.
  • Pros: light weight, sharp
  • Cons: long (but necessary)
  • Read full review
Overall 9
9.0

User Review

angus, pentaxforums.com
29 April 2011
  • Excerpt: I recently bought this lens second hand to use with an adapter on my Pentax K-5 and I must say it does not disappoint. It is lightweight and can be handheld though it can be hit and miss even with the anti-shake as it equals 600mm on a fullframe equivalent.
  • Pros: light, build quality, optical quality
  • Cons: none
  • Read full review
Overall 9
9.0

User Review

dgpaterson2000, pentaxforums.com
6 March 2011
  • Excerpt: This lens looks enormous when complete with its large lenshood but is surprisingly light for its size. It is very sharp at f5.6 and remains so until at least f16. However extreme care is required to get sharp images due to shake/vibration etc even when mounted on a good strong tripod. You really have to hone your long-lens technique to get this one to work for you. But when you get things right the results are extremely pleasing.
  • Pros: Very sharp, not heavy, efficient hood.
  • Cons: Does not focus very close. AF hunts a bit.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

User Review

pentaxforums.com
9 June 2009
  • Excerpt: Perhaps the best 400mm lens out there for hand-holding. Size-wise, it's comparable to most other manufacturer's 300mm lenses.
  • Pros: Size, weight, build
  • Cons: cost
  • Read full review