Reviews and Problems with Pentax DA 40mm f/2.8 Limited
Showing 1-6 of 6
31 December 2013
Excerpt: HD renewal wasn't good enough. It just add HD coating, circular aperture, and several detail change and that's it!!! PENTAX try to get more money from us which is $546 from $374. Sharpness? Same. I really disappointed about what Pentax did.
Pros: Small, HD coating, Circular aperture
Cons: No difference from the old one, Almost $200 over
Excerpt: I had it for a year or so (I love the 40mm focal length), as it made a really nice and compact package on my 5d mk II and, better still, on the ME Super. But I ended up selling it. It has two flaws:
Excerpt: I bought my 40mm pancake lens with a (very) used MX body. I find it a good combination for street photography, as they make a lightweight combination and the 40mm size is just right for the sort of urban shots I like.
Excerpt: The SMC Pentax-M f/1:2.8 40mm is the original Pentax "pancake" lens. At the time, it was the only one produced (by Pentax) and was highly desirable for the M bodies. The combination made it the first "pocketable" SLR camera. (But, you needed a large pocket.)
Pros: small, exceptional construction quality
Cons: difficult ot find focus ring when used to 'normal' sized lenses
Excerpt: Резкий с диафрагмы 5,6. Явно длинноват для фото в квартире. Очень большая МДФ. Часто автофокус цепляется за пёстрый фон. На pentaxforums резкость объектива оценили на "9", тогда пластмассовому зенитару 50/2 надо давать "11" баллов.