www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Panasonic-lumix-g-x-vario-35-100mm-f2-8.33669000
9.3 out of 10

Panasonic LUMIX G X VARIO 35-100mm F2.8

/* Style Definitions */ p.PnaOverviewHeader { margin-bottom Read more

Great Deal: $23.95

Reviews and Problems with Panasonic LUMIX G X VARIO 35-100mm F2.8

Showing 1-5 of 5
Overall 4
4.0

Suffers from known Micro Jitter issue that Panasonic refuses to recognize.

Tom S. "Tom S.", Amazon
18 September 2014
  • Summary: Unfortunately this very expensive lens is marred with a bad flaw when used for video, that Panasonic can likely fix very easily, but they are not acknowledging the issue. The problem is what is referred to as micro-jitter. When hand-holding, you will want to use the built in Optical Stabilizer. For photos it works well, but for video, you will notice the picture jumps around a little bit (jitters).
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

did I get a bad lens? O.I.S. micro jitters limit this lens to tripod-only use when shooting video

David J. Patterson "davidp158", Amazon
6 August 2014
  • Summary: I just bought a Panasonic 35-100mm lens, and hand held shooting produces micro-jitters when the O.I.S. is enabled. Hand held, my Panasonic 12-35mm and 14-140mm lenses are much more stable in O.I.S. mode. This issue aside, the 35-100mm lens has excellent image quality, and the exposure appears to remain constant through its range (unlike the 12-35mm lens). Mounted on a tripod without the need for O.I.S. this lens performs very well. However, the spastic O.I.S.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

It's a good $750 lens

bousozoku, Amazon
6 April 2014
  • Summary: Having worked with quite a bit of good equipment, I was interested in micro Four-Thirds as Olympus' Four-Thirds business seemed to be winding down. I bought a Panasonic GH3 with the 35-100mm f/2.8 and the 45-200mm f/4.0-5.6 lenses. This compared to my Olympus E-5, 35-100mm f/2.0, and 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5. I expected less but I was a bit shocked. As I photograph sports, I need equipment that is weather-sealed, such as the 35-100mm f/2.8 and the GH3 body.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Disappointing

Bill in Jax, B&H Photo
20 July 2013
  • Excerpt: Bought this lens to go with the 12-35, which is a very good lens. This was sharp at the center, but never got sharp across the frame at any aperture. Maybe I got a bad sample, but at this price I should not have to do the QC. Returned.
  • Pros: Built Well
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Word of warning - extremely slow delivery!!! The lens itself is wonderful

BookWorm, Amazon
3 July 2013
  • Summary: I've tried this lens in a store and borrowed from a friend - considering the size difference with its APS-C analog 70-200mm f 2.8 this is an absolutely amazing lens that does not extends. The only negative besides the price that according some reviews it is prone to flare more than one would expect in this price range. The rating reflects my customer experience, not the lens.
  • Read full review