Reviews, reviews, reviews...

9.5 out of 10

Olympus ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 50~200mm F2.8~3.5

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Olympus ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 50~200mm F2.8~3.5

Showing 1-4 of 4

Lens Test: Olympus Zuiko Digital 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5 ED AF

Pop Photo
8 July 2012
  • Excerpt: Don't include this $1200 (street) tool in the large class of 55-200mm f/4.5-5.6 lenses from other lensmakers. Though it has a similar range, the Olympus Zuiko 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5 is much more a pro's lens than those slower kit zooms. On an Olympus or Panasonic Four Thirds DSLR, it converts to a 100-400mm equivalent, making it one of the brightest and most compact lenses to reach 400mm.
  • Read full review

REVIEW: Olympus Zuiko ED 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5

25 March 2012
  • Conclusion: The optical performance of this lens warrants the price on it’s own although the build quality is also quite good and the claimed splash proof design should help endear owners likely to spend time in outdoor environments. No fan here of totally electronic focussing, I would worry about the delicacy of this type of system and the delays it causes in confirming a focus fix, but, short of destructive testing, I have no way of knowing how robust the system is likely to be.
  • Pros: Excellent optical performance across the board, Good build quality that is externally simple and splash proof, Nice carry case supplied
  • Cons: Manual focus/over-ride only through camera menu, Autofocus a little slow. Takes a second to lock on., Hood seems a little fragile for class of lens.
  • Read full review
Overall 10

Olympus ED 50-200mm f2.8-3.5

21 January 2013
  • Conclusion: Somewhat disappointing at full-zoom, but super-sharp at other focal lengths and totally free of chromatic aberration
  • Read full review

TEST: Olympus ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 50-200mm 1:2.8-3.5 oraz ED 70-300mm 1:4.0-5.6

6 April 2012
  • Summary: Długie zoomy to obiektywy atrakcyjne nie tylko dla amatorów fotografowania dzikiej przyrody. Prezentujemy wyniki testu dwóch teleobiektywów Olympusa przeznaczonych dla systemu 4/3.
  • Read full review Translate to English