Reviews and Problems with Olympus ZUIKO DIGITAL 11~22mm F2.8~3.5
Showing 1-9 of 9
AMAZING LENS; INCREDABLE SHARPNESS
23 June 2011
Summary: I have had this lens for over three years now, and Love It !! I have been using it on an E-500, and it gives truely great images. Now I have started using it on an EM-5, and the results with it are even better. I really like shooting Black and White with the E-500, and the 11-22 gives me the results I am looking for. The lens shows great contrast, so I get a full range of tones in my images.
Summary: The 11 - 22mm F/2.8-3.5 it can either give off a great wide angle shot for that wave crashing on the beach or that up close shot of a beautiful flower in the summer, this lens does have a tiny bit of distortion, not so much of the sides when in the widest focal mm but more in the stretching of the subject.
Summary: This is a wonderful lens! I've been a Zuikoholic for decades, and was bemoaning having to switch to N/C, when the 4/3rds system came out. I waited out the E-1, not feeling inspired by any of the glass, especially at the wide end. Then this lens and the stupendous 7-14 came out, and I jumped into the 4/3rds system with no regrets. This lens is so sharp, you'll need to soften portraiture a bit. It has no discernible vignetting or pincushion/barrell distortion.
Pros: Super image quality, no linear distortion near edges.
Cons: I would rather have had two prime lenses, each with an extra stop and less weight.
Summary: I like to shoot wide-angle lens, and I bought this lens even before I got my E-500! I chose this over the 14-54. Then, I just have to wait for the right time to get the E-500 with the 40-150 on the used market. My luck to get a 2-month old 40-150 with the E-500 purchase for RM2800 (USD760). OK, my Nikon buddy was flabbergasted at the 2.8-3.5 range, with the price, small size and excellent build quality.
Pros: - excellent build, - fast at wide, - no vignetting, - fast focus, - rectilinear, - quiet motor
Summary: Ein hervorragendes Weitwinkel ohne jegliche Randunschärfen, zweichnet durchweg ohne Verzeichnung messerscharf ab, sehr lichtstark!! Optimale Blende bei 11mm 2.8-11. War zu Gast auf der ISS...nicht ohne Grund! Nur zu empfehlen!!
Summary: Meget bra by-objektiv. Jeg har både 7-14, 11-22 og 14-54, og mens jeg stort sett bruker 7-14 og 14-54 i naturen, så har jeg registret at jeg bruker 11-22 mest i byen. Jeg har nettop vært i Paris, London og Roma og i alle byene var det 11-22 som ble mest brukt. Jeg har kjøpt 11-22 pga. bedre lysstyrke enn 7-14 som jeg bruker i juvvandring i alpene på sommeren, hvor det er begrenset med lys og plass.
Pros: Bra byggekvalitet.
- Bra lysstyrke, særlig på vidvinkel hvor det er klart bedre enn 7-14 som har f/4 hele veien.
- Bra optisk kvalitet, nesten ingen CA.
- Skarp fra største blender.
Cons: Vanskelig å få av linsedeksel med solblenderen utover.