www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Olympus M.Zuiko ED  75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II
9.2 out of 10

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II

Great Deal: $449.99

Reviews and Problems with Olympus M.Zuiko ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II

Showing 1-10 of 203
Overall 8
8.0

Great zoom range

ppp_us, B&H Photo
2 weeks ago
  • Excerpt: Bought this lens as I heard this will be best fit for olympus camera compared to lumix 100-300mm. Lighter and cheap and has similar image quality. The lens has good reach and works well with good light (600mm) and with olympus em5 mark ii, 5 axis stabilization I got good sharp handheld results upto...
  • Pros: Durable, Easily Interchangeable, Lightweight, Nice Bokeh
  • Cons: Poor in Low Light, Slow Aperture At Long End
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Just a shutterbug mom who wants to take photos - love this lens

Becky Lockman, Amazon
3 weeks ago
  • Summary: I purchased this lens for to get closer / better pictures of my son playing t-ball. From the first time I put this lens on my camera, I was impressed with the zoom and the quality of the photos. Each time I used the lens over the course of the season I continued to be impressed with the lens.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Good reach, needs a lot of practice to setup ...

ERIC, Amazon
2 July 2015
  • Summary: Good reach, needs a lot of practice to setup the camera depending on the light . needs often to shot over ISO 800 to 4000 at 300 mm ( to have shutter speed over 600 and so have clear pictures) good lens overall, light can be an issue depending on situation.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

very sharp

elwitz, B&H Photo
11 June 2015
  • Excerpt: Have had experience with 3 other OM lenses with mixed results but this one is by far the sharpest. Except for the long zoom range it would be my go-to lens. Surprised it did not come with a lens hood.
  • Pros: Consistent Output, Easily Interchangeable, Fast / accurate auto-focus
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Great lens

Ann Norman, Amazon
11 June 2015
  • Summary: This is a powerful lens which allowed me to get great graduation photos (from a stadium seat) of my son receiving his high school diploma. Easy to use and fits my Olympus OM-D E-M10 camera. I got clear photos without using a tripod.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Affordable Stopgap Until Olympus 300mm f/4.0 PRO is Available

Paste Pot Pete, B&H Photo
6 June 2015
  • Excerpt: I bought this lens a few months ago, mainly to see what I could do with a supertelephoto focal length and anticipate whether or not I'd want the Olympus 300mm f/4.0 PRO when it becomes available.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

A pretty good lens

BF, Amazon
1 June 2015
  • Summary: Physically a beautiful lens, handles well, long reach, light enough to work well with my OMD-EM5, but the images are distinctly a little soft.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Worst lens I have ever owned

Gear Guy, B&H Photo
26 May 2015
  • Excerpt: Not sharp at all. even at 200mm Very soft and lacking in clarity. Sending back.
  • Cons: Blurry Focus, Poor in Low Light
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

light lens with a great reach

Dave C, B&H Photo
22 May 2015
  • Excerpt: So being a Canon DSLR guy, when I want long distance reach, it means heavy glass. I'm shooting this lens on the Oly OMD EM5 MkII and the combination is very light. Image quality is very good throughout the range.
  • Pros: Consistent Output, Fast / accurate auto-focus, Lightweight
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Nice handling long zoom lens for micro four thirds

Steve the Hiker, B&H Photo
19 May 2015
  • Excerpt: In an effort to go smaller and lighter and improve image stabilization, I recently replaced my Olympus OMD-EM1 with an Olympus OMD-EM5II. At the same time, I replaced a number of lenses, including the Panasonic Lumix 100-300mm f/4.0-5.6 with the M. Zuiko ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II. I find the M.
  • Pros: Compact, Consistent Output, Durable, Easily Interchangeable, Fast / accurate auto-focus, Lightweight, Nice Handling, Smooth operation
  • Cons: Poor At Fast Action, Poor in Low Light
  • Read full review
Next page >>