www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED (4.3x)
9.2 out of 10

Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED (4.3x)

Nikon has hit a home run with this Nikkor, which has a variable Read more

Great Deal: $549.99

Reviews and Problems with Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED (4.3x)

Showing 1-10 of 11
Overall 4
4.0

Expensive for what it is

Boris71, Nikon
14 June 2012
  • Summary: With a 16mp sensor, the lens is good to 135mm, and then the image quality starts to decline . At 300mm I find it useless for my purposes when using the D7000.
  • Read Full Review
Overall 4
4.0

Too much money for too little performance

DianeH "DianeH", Amazon
27 August 2011
Overall 4
4.0

Good lens when it works

dsh, Nikon
15 April 2011
  • Summary: The optical quality of the lens is very good. But I had already repaired this lens three times because of autofocus problem.
  • Read Full Review
Overall 4
4.0

poor sharpness

arli, Nikon
31 July 2010
  • Summary: This lens is good to handle, but it has a poor sharpness.
  • Read Full Review
Overall 4
4.0

Sub-par lens

Nikonbird, Nikon
30 July 2010
  • Summary: I am very disappointed with this lens. I bought it for bird photography and I find that 1) the quality of the photos is so so, 2) the lens itself plus the camera are so...
  • Read Full Review
Overall 4
4.0

I Guess I Got a "Bad Copy" of the 70-300 VR

Scout264 "BobbyV", Amazon
27 October 2009
Overall 4
4.0

Not worth the money at all

sailingshot, epinions.com
4 December 2006
  • Summary: Okay....there are now three Nikon lenses that are 70-300. The least expensive version is the G type
  • Pros: Better built than other 70-300 models at the moment.
  • Cons: Silly price for what you get. NO macro mode.
  • Read Full Review
Overall 4
4.0

Didn't expect a lot, but got even less

pringlw, epinions.com
16 January 2005
  • Summary: I read a ton of reviews before I picked up this lens and one thing is clear.
  • Pros: Light, inexpensive, relatively small
  • Cons: Very poor AF (constantly hunts), lots of chromatic aberration
  • Read Full Review
Overall 4
4.0

Very expensive and heavy

Carlos, woolworths.co.uk
5 March 2012
  • Summary: Qulaity product by Nikon but very expensive and heavy. Cheaper alternatives are available and this lens only for real enthusiasts.
  • Pros: Well Made
  • Cons: Bad Design
  • Read Full Review
Overall 4
4.0

Very expensive and heavy

Carlos, isme.com
5 March 2012
  • Summary: Qulaity product by Nikon but very expensive and heavy. Cheaper alternatives are available and this lens only for real enthusiasts.
  • Pros: Well Made
  • Cons: Bad Design
  • Read Full Review
Next page >>