www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Nikon 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR AF-S DX
9.5 out of 10

Nikon 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR AF-S DX

Super-telephoto 5.5x zoom lens with Vibration Reduction II. Su Read more

Great Deal: $229.00

Reviews and Problems with Nikon 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR AF-S DX

Showing 1-10 of 27
Overall 2
2.0

Factory Refurbished but.....

Deborah A Ritch, Amazon
8 April 2015
  • Summary: Lens was "Certified Factory Refurbished". Don't know if that had anything to do with my problems or if it's just a bad lens. I couldn't get it to focus properly. Used auto-focus and had problems. Focused manually and had problems. It was hit or miss as to whether or not it would focus.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

I would never buy from this seller

rakuten
18 December 2014
  • Summary: BE CAREFUL!!! buying items from this seller. You may be fooled with high discount / deal numbers. Make sure you compare items online with other retailers before buying. Also the items may not qualify for actual warranty from original manufacturer.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

I got lense nikon af-s 55mm 300mm with water spot ...

mehul, Amazon
8 July 2014
  • Summary: I got lense nikon af-s 55mm 300mm with water spot inside middle of lense wich I cant able to clear with clinging material and as per my order there must be 5pc of filter lenses but I got just 3pc of filter lenses.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Lens macro and tele are foggy

Hemant Patel, Amazon
20 June 2014
  • Summary: The lens is foggy. Worthless. Do not buy this junk. do not buy this. it is worthless. save yourself the money.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

User Review

Lint, Adorama
2 March 2014
  • Excerpt: When I first purchased this lens for my Nikon D7100, I never imagined that I would get a defective lens. There was lint inside the internal lenses with no option to clean them. I would probably ignore a small piece if it was at the edge of the lens but when you have (3) spots of lint in the middle...
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Disappointed!

Double Bogie, B&H Photo
2 December 2013
  • Excerpt: I bought this lens 2 years ago and it was great at first. I was taking photos at 300mm handheld and they were really sharp. After about a year the lens would not focus automatically or manually. No matter what I do I can't get a sharp picture. I've always been very careful with my camera and lenses.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

This is a DX NOT an ED lense!

photo enthusiest, buydig.com
20 August 2013
  • Excerpt: The lense advertised is NOT an ED lens it is a DX lens. The ED's sell for $1000. You can tell by zooming in on the lense image. To the right of the info it will read either "ED" or "DX". Don't be fooled. The ED is pro quality the DX is not. Was this review helpful? |
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

The lense shown is a DX NOT and ED Lense! It makes a difference of about $500!

Amazon Customer "NeogenIsis Holistic Health", Amazon
20 August 2013
  • Summary: The description of this lens says its and ED lens, but the image is a DX! There is a huge difference in price as the ED is pro quality the DX is not. If the price seems too good to be true, it probably is.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Do not recommend

Arun, B&H Photo
1 May 2013
  • Excerpt: Though i have taken only less than 500 photographs so far, i am not at all happy with the quality of the output. Beyond 250 there is heavy noise and i do not see any significant difference over my kit lens 55-200mm. This is not at all compatible with any of the tele-convertors as well.
  • Cons: Difficult To Use
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Ritz sales/service sucks

Find somwhere else to purchase, WolfCamera.com
25 March 2012
  • Conclusion: Never recieved product only excusses from both Ritz and FedEx.
  • Cons: Never recieved product
  • Read full review
Next page >>